...
首页> 外文期刊>Teaching and Learning in Medicine >Debate Preparation/Participation: An Active, Effective Learning Tool
【24h】

Debate Preparation/Participation: An Active, Effective Learning Tool

机译:辩论准备/参与:一种积极有效的学习工具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Passive educational techniques (such as lectures) are thought to be less productive than active learning. Purpose: We examined whether preparing for and participating in a debate would be an effective, active way to learn about a controversial topic. Methods: We compared quiz performance in residents who attended a lecture to residents who prepared for/participated in a debate. Twelve residents each participated in one lecture session and one debate session. Learning was evaluated via a quiz. Quizzes were given twice: before the debate/lecture and 1 week after the debate/lecture. Quiz scores were compared using repeated measures analysis of variance, with a p value of < .05 considered significant. A survey evaluating the usefulness of debating was given to all participants. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in the pretest mean quiz score between the debate and lecture groups: 78.3% and 52.5%, respectively (p = .02). Similarly, on posttest quizzes, the average debater scored 85.8%, versus 61.7% for the lecture group (p = .003). Although no one in the debate group scored lower on a follow-up quiz, 3 residents in the lecture group did worse on follow-up. Conclusions: When learning about a controversial topic, residents who prepared for/participated in a debate achieved higher quiz scores and were better at retaining information than those who attended a lecture. When faced with teaching a controversial topic, organizing a debate may be more effective than giving a lecture.
机译:背景:被动式教育技术(例如讲座)被认为比主动学习的生产力低。目的:我们研究了准备和参加辩论是否是了解某个有争议主题的有效,积极方式。方法:我们将参加演讲的居民与准备/参加辩论的居民的测验成绩进行了比较。十二名居民分别参加了一次讲座和一场辩论会。通过测验评估学习。两次测验:辩论/演讲之前和辩论/演讲之后1周。使用重复测量方差分析比较测验得分,p值<0.05被认为是显着的。对所有参与者进行了一项评估辩论有效性的调查。结果:辩论组和演讲组之间的测验前平均测验得分有统计学差异:分别为78.3%和52.5%(p = .02)。同样,在测试后测验中,辩论者的平均得分为85.8%,而演讲者组的得分为61.7%(p = 0.003)。尽管辩论组中没有人在后续测验中得分较低,但演讲组中的3名居民在随访中表现较差。结论:当了解一个有争议的话题时,准备/参加辩论的居民比参加演讲的人更高的测验分数,并且在保留信息方面更好。当面对具有争议性的话题时,组织辩论可能比演讲更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号