...
首页> 外文期刊>S.W.A.T. >A STAB IN THE BACK OF GUN OWNERS
【24h】

A STAB IN THE BACK OF GUN OWNERS

机译:枪支拥有者背后的刺杀

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

By now you have likely heard an earful of outrage in the gun rights community about the stab in the back that is the Bush Administration's Solicitor General's brief in the D.C. v. Heller case before the Supreme Court. By the time you read this, a decision will likely be mere days away.rnFor decades gun owners hoped that the Supreme Court, with a conservative majority, would one day hear such a case and rule, once and for all, that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms-not a collective right of the states, as the lying anti-gun hoplophobes insist. But now that such a chance has come, the Bush Administration has submitted an amicus brief in support of the D.C. gun ban, denying that the Second Amendment is any barrier whatsoever to all of the unconstitutional gun laws that have been enacted since 1934.rnThe DOJ brief should have simply ex-rnpressed the clear intent of the Founders that the right to keep and bear arms protected by the Second Amendment should be treated with as much respect as the right to free speech protected by the First Amendment.
机译:到现在为止,您可能已经听到枪支维权人士大声疾呼,说背后的刺伤是布什政府副检察长在最高法院D.C. Heller案中的摘要。到您读这篇文章时,可能只有几天之遥。几十年来,持枪者希望拥有保守多数的最高法院有一天会一劳永逸地聆听第二修正案,保护个人拥有武器的权利,而不是国家的集体权利,正如说谎的反枪支恐怖分子所坚持的那样。但是现在有了这样的机会,布什政府提交了一份法庭之友简报来支持DC枪支禁令,否认《第二修正案》对自1934年以来制定的所有违宪枪支法律都是任何障碍。简要说明应该只是简单地表达了创始人的明确意图,即,应将与第二修正案所保护的武器持有权和携带权同被第一修正案所保护的言论自由权同等重视。

著录项

  • 来源
    《S.W.A.T.》 |2008年第6期|363840|共3页
  • 作者

    STEWART RHODES;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号