首页> 外文期刊>Sustainable Water Resources Management >Economic analyses of implemented tailwater recovery systems in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley
【24h】

Economic analyses of implemented tailwater recovery systems in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley

机译:小密西西比山谷实施尾翼回收系统的经济分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Tailwater recovery (TWR) systems are being implemented on agricultural landscapes to reduce nutrient loss and save water on the landscape for irrigation. These systems are a large financial investment for both the United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS) and private producers with total costs ranging from $400,000 to 900,000. Although economic analyses of TWR systems have been modeled, analyses of implemented TWR systems have yet to be completed. Economic studies are necessary to guide adaptive management of conservation funding for appropriation in methods with the greatest return. Therefore, an analysis was conducted on the costs and benefits of TWR systems by first comparing net present value (NPV) and benefit-to-cost ratios (BCR) of operation scenarios with and without TWR systems, as well as, with and without sediment reduction benefits. Second, the impact of the level of USDA NRCS financial assistance on NPV was evaluated. Three discount rates of 3,7, and 10% were used on both rented and owned land schemes. Five TWR system scenarios were used in the investigation including dryland, irrigated, irrigation improvements, TWR systems, and TWR systems with external benefits of sediment loss mitigation. NPV and BCRs were positive and greater than one for TWR systems if producers owned the land but remained negative or less than one if land was rented. Beyond improvements to irrigation infrastructure, farms with a TWR system installed lost NPV of $51 to $328 per ha. Therefore, TWR systems are not considered to be economically viable when land is not owned.
机译:尾翼恢复(TWR)系统正在农业景观中实施,以减少养分损失,并在灌溉景观中节约水。这些系统是美国农业部的大型金融投资,适用于美国农业部自然资源保护服务(USDA NRC)和私营生产商,总费用从400,000美元到900,000美元。虽然TWR系统的经济分析已经建模,但实施的TWR系统的分析尚未完成。经济研究是指导拨款的适应性管理,以获得最大的回报。因此,通过首先将净现值(NPV)和有利 - 到成本比(BCR)与具有和而无需沉积物,对TWR系统的成本和益处进行分析减少福利。其次,评估了USDA NRC水平对NPV的财政援助的影响。在租用和拥有的土地方案中使用了3个折扣率为3,7和10%。在调查中使用了五个TWR系统场景,包括旱地,灌溉,灌溉改进,TWR系统和具有沉积物损失缓解外部益处的TWR系统。如果生产者拥有土地但是如果租用土地仍然是负数,但如果生产者持续的,则NPV和BCRS是正的,而且对于TWR系统而言。除了改善灌溉基础设施,拥有TWR系统的农场安装的损失为每人51美元至328美元的NPV。因此,当土地不拥有时,TWR系统不被认为是经济上可行的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Sustainable Water Resources Management》 |2019年第2期|901-919|共19页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Wildlife Fisheries and Aquaculture Mississippi State University PO Box 9690 Biloxi MS 39762-9690 USA;

    Coastal Research and Extension Center Mississippi State University Biloxi MS 39532 USA;

    Department of Agricultural Economics Delta Research and Extension Center Mississippi State University Stoneville MS 38776 USA;

    Covington Civil and Environmental LLC 2510 14th Street Suite 1212 Gulfport MS 39501 USA;

    Department of Wildlife Fisheries and Aquaculture Mississippi State University PO Box 9690 Biloxi MS 39762-9690 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Best management practices; Water reuse; Irrigation; Water quantity; Economic analysis;

    机译:最佳管理实践;水重用;灌溉;水量;经济分析;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号