...
首页> 外文期刊>Sustainability science >Niching sustainability in an Indigenous community: protected areas, autonomous initiatives, and negotiating power in natural resource management
【24h】

Niching sustainability in an Indigenous community: protected areas, autonomous initiatives, and negotiating power in natural resource management

机译:巩固土著社区的可持续性:自然资源管理中的保护区,自主倡议和谈判权

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although sustainability science has been developed within the Western knowledge system, and Indigenous science has been studied at the local level, these two streams of thought are premised on a common understanding of the relationship between humans and the environment. The practitioners of each, however, have not yet engaged in productive, practical dialog. This paper used cooperative game theory to better understand the choices and tradeoffs made by Indigenous Taiwanese villagers who were in a "competitive" situation with regard to Indigenous autonomy and government-led protected areas. The aim was to understand how interactions among different groups of local people could affect community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) processes that aim to balance environmental sustainability with Indigenous autonomy. Results show that the knowledge and rights of Indigenous people could be part of a compromising collaboration with legislation-supported protected areas, if this collaboration benefits Indigenous autonomy as well as sustainability of the local environment and livelihoods. Indigenous science can inform changing landscapes, while sustainability science can provide analytical approaches and planning schemes for resilience. We suggest, though, that the trade-off process should be open and include a well-communicated mechanism through which all parties can negotiate power in a mutually agreeable way, merging Indigenous and sustainability concerns into one actionable collaboration. The types of conflicts analyzed in this study are characteristic of the conflicts typically associated with sustainable development.
机译:尽管在西方知识体系内已经开发了可持续性科学,并且在地方一级对土著科学进行了研究,但这两种思想流都基于对人类与环境之间关系的共识。但是,每个人的从业人员尚未参与富有成效的实用对话。本文使用合作博弈理论来更好地了解在自主性和政府主导的保护区方面处于“竞争”状态的台湾台湾村民的选择和权衡。目的是了解不同群体的当地人之间的互动如何影响基于社区的自然资源管理(CBNRM)流程,该流程旨在平衡环境可持续性与土著自治。结果表明,如果这种合作有利于土著自治以及当地环境和生计的可持续性,那么土著人民的知识和权利可能会成为与立法支持的保护区的有损合作的一部分。土著科学可以为不断变化的景观提供信息,而可持续性科学可以为提高韧性提供分析方法和规划方案。但是,我们建议权衡过程应该是开放的,并包括一个沟通良好的机制,所有各方都可以通过这种机制以相互同意的方式谈判权力,将土著和可持续性问题合并为一个可行的合作。本研究中分析的冲突类型是通常与可持续发展相关的冲突的特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号