...
首页> 外文期刊>Sustainability science >Connotations of institutions: implications for governing natural resources
【24h】

Connotations of institutions: implications for governing natural resources

机译:机构的内涵:对管理自然资源的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Institutionalism is a widely debated term across various disciplines. It is rooted in the traditional old American economists and the new institutionalism, involving individual choices and transaction costs in economic settings. However, institutionalism has been used in many other disciplines, evolving from economic studies to studies on institutions for governing natural resources. This paper aims to review the theoretical concepts of institutions as argued by Douglas North regarding economic performance, and the contrasting sociological point of view linked with the approaches elaborated by Elinor Ostrom in governing the commons. While North points out that formal and informal constraints constitute the instances of institutions, Ostrom contends that institutions are the set of rules that humans use to organize repetitive activities within a community. Although there are some differences in their postures, the similarity of their approaches on institutions as drivers to solve problems leads to the assumption that informal rules, transmitted through generations, can help sustain communities' organizations for governing natural resources overtime.
机译:制度主义是各种学科的广泛争论。它植根于传统的老美国经济学家和新的制度主义,涉及各个选择和经济环境的交易成本。然而,在许多其他学科中使用了制度主义,从经济研究发展到了对管理自然资源的机构研究。本文旨在审查Douglas北部关于经济表现所争论的机构的理论概念,以及与俄罗斯鸵鸟在管理公约中阐述的方法相关的对比社会观点。虽然北方指出,正式和非正式的制约构成机构的情况,但奥斯特罗姆认为机构是人类用于组织社区内重复活动的规则。虽然他们的姿势存在一些差异,但他们对解决问题的驱动因素的机构方法的相似性导致通过世代传播的非正式规则,可以帮助维持社区组织加管自然资源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号