首页> 外文期刊>Surgical infections >Immediate Closure of Abdominal Cavity with Biologic Mesh versus Temporary Abdominal Closure of Open Abdomen in Non-Trauma Emergency Patients (CLOSE-UP Study)
【24h】

Immediate Closure of Abdominal Cavity with Biologic Mesh versus Temporary Abdominal Closure of Open Abdomen in Non-Trauma Emergency Patients (CLOSE-UP Study)

机译:腹腔立即闭合生物网眼腹腔与非创伤急诊患者临时腹部腹部闭合(特写研究)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: In more than 10% of emergency laparotomies in non-trauma patients, primary fascial closure is not achievable because of excessive visceral edema, which leaves the patient with an open abdomen (OA). An OA harbors an inherent high risk of serious complications, and temporary closure devices are used to achieve delayed fascial closure. A potential new strategy in preventing OA is immediate closure during the emergency procedure with a non-crosslinked biologic mesh.Methods: This is a prospective comparative cohort feasibility study in 13 teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Non-trauma patients who underwent emergency laparotomy in which regular sutured primary fascial closure was not achievable because of excessive intra-abdominal edema were eligible. In one cohort, Biomesh (n = 20), the abdominal cavity was immediately closed at the emergency laparotomy with a non-crosslinked biologic mesh. In a parallel cohort, Control (n = 20), the resulting OA was managed by temporary abdominal closure (TAC; inlay polyglactin [Vicryl (TM)] mesh [n = 7]) or commercial (ABThera(TM)) abdominal negative pressure therapy device (n = 13)). The primary end point was the proportion of closed abdominal cavities at 90 days.Results: At 90 days, 65% (13/20) of the abdominal cavities were closed in the Biomesh cohort versus 45% (9/20) in Controls (p = 0.204). In the Biomesh cohort, seven of 20 (35%) patients had at least one major complication versus 15 of 20 (75%) patients in the Control cohort (p = 0.011). Both the median number of intensive care unit (ICU) and mechanical ventilation days were significantly lower in the Biomesh cohort; one versus 10 (p = 0.002) and 0 versus four (p = 0.003) days, respectively. The number of abdominal reoperations was significantly lower in the Biomesh cohort (median 0 vs. two, p 0.001; total number five vs. 44).Conclusions: If primary fascial closure cannot be achieved at the emergency laparotomy in non-trauma patients, immediate abdominal closure by use of a non-crosslinked biologic mesh prevents OA management. This results in a non-significant higher proportion of closed abdominal cavities at 90 days compared with OA management with TAC techniques, and in a significant reduction of major complications and reoperations, and a shorter ICU stay.
机译:背景:在非创伤患者中超过10%的紧急腹膜切开术中,由于过度的内脏水肿,原发性迷你闭合不能可实现,这使患者患有一个开放的腹部(OA)。 OA HARBORS具有固有的严重并发症的高风险,并且临时闭合装置用于实现延迟的拟合闭合。预防OA的潜在新策略是在紧急程序中立即关闭的,在紧急情况下,非交联的生物网格。方法:这是荷兰13名教学医院的前瞻性比较队列可行性研究。由于腹腔内水肿过多有符合条件,不可达到紧急剖腹手术的非创伤患者的患者,其中不可实现。在一个队列中,生物学(n = 20),腹腔立即用非交联的生物网状物紧急剖腹细节闭合。在平行队列中,控制(n = 20),所得OA通过临时腹部闭合来管理(TAC;镶嵌多烯酰基[VICRYL(TM)网眼[n = 7])或商业(Abthera(TM))腹部负压治疗装置(n = 13))。初级终点是90天闭孔腔腔的比例。结果:在90天内,在生物学队列与45%(9/20)中闭合65%(13/20)的腹腔,对照组(p = 0.204)。在生物学队列中,七种(35%)患者的7个患者至少有一个重复并发症,对照队列中的15个(75%)患者(P = 0.011)。生物学队列中,重症监护单元(ICU)和机械通气日的中位数和机械通气日都显着较低;一个与10(p = 0.002)和0分别与四(p = 0.003)天。生物学队列(中位0与2,P <0.001)的腹部再次转录的数量显着降低,P <0.001;总数五与44)。CONCLUSIONS:如果在非创伤患者的紧急剖腹手术术中无法实现原发性迷恋闭合,通过使用非交联的生物网状物直接腹部闭合防止OA管理。与TAC技术的OA管理相比,这导致90天的非显着较高比例的闭孔腔腔,并在显着降低主要并发症和重新进展,并缩短ICU。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号