...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical infections >Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Gram-Negative Pathogens Isolated from Patients with Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections in South African Hospitals (SMART Study 2004-2009): Impact of the New Carbapenem Breakpoints
【24h】

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Gram-Negative Pathogens Isolated from Patients with Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections in South African Hospitals (SMART Study 2004-2009): Impact of the New Carbapenem Breakpoints

机译:南非医院从复杂的腹腔内感染患者中分离出的革兰氏阴性病原菌的抗菌敏感性(SMART研究2004-2009):新的碳青霉烯断点的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: The Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) follows trends in resistance among aerobic and facultative anaerobic gram-negative bacilli (GNB) isolated from complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) in patients around the world. Methods: During 2004-2009, three centralized clinical microbiology laboratories serving 59 private hospitals in three large South African cities collected 1,218 GNB from complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) and tested them for susceptibility to 12 antibiotics according to the 2011 Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Results: Enterobacteriaceae comprised 83.7% of the isolates. Escherichia coli was the species isolated most commonly (46.4%), and 7.6% of these were extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-positive. The highest ESBL rate was documented for Klebsiella pneumoniae (41.2%). Overall, ertapenem was the antibiotic most active against susceptible species for which it has breakpoints (94.6%) followed by amikacin (91.9%), piperacillin-tazobactam (89.3%), and imipenem-cilastatin (87.1%), whereas rates of resistance to ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin were documented to be 29.7%, 28.7%, 22.5%, and 21.1%, respectively. Multi-drug resistance (MDR), defined as resistance to three or more antibiotic classes, was significantly more common in K. pneumoniae (27.9%) than in E. coli (4.9%; p< 0.0001) or Proteus mirabilis (4.1%; p< 0.05). Applying the new CLSI breakpoints for carbapenems, susceptibility to ertapenem was reduced significantly in ESBL-positive £. coli compared with ESBL-negative isolates (91% vs. 98%; p<0.05), but this did not apply to imipenem-cilastatin (95% vs. 99%; p = 0.0928). A large disparity between imipenem-cilastatin and ertapenem susceptibility in P. mirabilis and Morganella morganii was documented (24% vs. 96% and 15% vs. 92%, respectively), as most isolates of these two species had imipenem-cilastatin minimum inhibitory concentrations in the 2-4mcg/mL range, which is no longer regarded as susceptible. Conclusions: This study documented substantial resistance to standard antimicrobial therapy among GNB commonly isolated from cIAIs in South Africa. With the application of the new CLSI carbapenem breakpoints, discrepancies were noted between ertapenem and imipenem-cilastatin with regard to the changes in their individual susceptibilities. Longitudinal surveillance of susceptibility patterns is useful to guide recommendations for empiric antibiotic use in cIAIs.
机译:背景:监测抗菌素耐药性趋势(SMART)的研究追踪了从全球患者中从复杂的腹腔内感染(cIAIs)中分离出的需氧和兼性厌氧革兰氏阴性细菌(GNB)的耐药性趋势。方法:在2004年至2009年期间,服务于南非三个大城市59家私立医院的三个中央临床微生物实验室从复杂的腹腔内感染(cIAIs)中收集了1,218个GNB,并根据2011临床实验室标准协会对它们进行了12种抗生素敏感性测试(CLSI)准则。结果:肠杆菌科细菌占分离株的83.7%。大肠杆菌是最常见的物种(46.4%),其中7.6%是超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)阳性。肺炎克雷伯菌有最高的ESBL发生率(41.2%)。总体而言,厄他培南是对易感物种最有活性的抗生素,其断点为(94.6%),其次为阿米卡星(91.9%),哌拉西林-他唑巴坦(89.3%)和亚胺培南-西司他丁(87.1%),而对头孢曲松,头孢噻肟,环丙沙星和左氧氟沙星的记录分别为29.7%,28.7%,22.5%和21.1%。定义为对三种或三种以上抗生素类别具有抗药性的多药抗药性(MDR)在肺炎克雷伯菌(27.9%)中比在大肠杆菌(4.9%; p <0.0001)或奇异变形杆菌(4.1%; p <0.05)。将新的CLSI断裂点应用于碳青霉烯类,可显着降低ESBL阳性患者对ertapenem的敏感性。大肠杆菌与ESBL阴性分离株相比(91%vs. 98%; p <0.05),但这不适用于亚胺培南-西司他丁(95%vs. 99%; p = 0.0928)。据记录,米氏疟原虫和摩根氏摩根氏菌中亚胺培南-西司他丁和厄他培南的药敏性存在很大差异(分别为24%比96%和15%对92%),因为这两个物种的大多数分离物均具有亚胺培南-西司他丁最低抑制作用浓度在2-4mcg / mL范围内,不再被认为是易感的。结论:这项研究记录了通常从南非cIAIs分离出的GNB中对标准抗菌治疗的实质性耐药性。随着新的CLSI碳青霉烯断点的应用,在厄他培南和亚胺培南-西司他丁之间就其个体敏感性的变化提出了差异。纵向敏感性监测有助于指导在cIAI中使用经验性抗生素的建议。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Surgical infections》 |2012年第1期|p.43-49|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Clinical Microbiology Ampath National Laboratory Services Milpark Hospital P.O. Box 1873, Houghton Johannesburg 2041, South Africa;

    Department of Clinical Microbiology, Ampath National Referral Laboratory, Centurion, Pretoria, South Africa;

    Department of Clinical Microbiology, Ampath National Laboratory Services, Johannesburg, South Africa;

    Department of Clinical Microbiology, Pathcare Reference Laboratory, Cape Town, South Africa;

    Dnternational Health Management Associates, Inc., Schaumburg, Illinois;

    Sandton Clinic, Sandton and University of Witwatersrand, Charlotte Maxeke Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa;

    Department of Critical Care, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital and University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa;

    Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital and University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa;

    Department of Surgery, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital and University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa;

    Department of Surgery, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital and University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa;

    Department of Critical Care, Groote Schuur Hospital, and University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa;

    Department of Critical Care, Steve Biko Academic Hospital, and University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa;

  • 收录信息 美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号