...
首页> 外文期刊>Surgical infections >Where's the Difference? Presentation of Nosocomial Infection in Critically Ⅲ Trauma versus General Surgery Patients
【24h】

Where's the Difference? Presentation of Nosocomial Infection in Critically Ⅲ Trauma versus General Surgery Patients

机译:区别在哪里?重症Ⅲ型创伤与普通外科患者的医院感染表现

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Diagnosing infection efficiently is integral to managing critically ill patients. Knowing if and how trauma and general surgery patients differ in their presentation of new infectious complications could be useful. We hypothesized these populations would differ in presentation in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: We analyzed data collected prospectively from all 1,657 trauma and general surgery patients admitted to the surgical and trauma ICU (STICU) over a 21-month period. Clinical data from the first day of a newly diagnosed infection were compared for trauma (82% of the series) and general surgery (18%) patients. Results: A total of 10,424 STICU days were included, and 267 nosocomial infections were diagnosed. Trauma patients were younger (50 vs. 62 years; p< 0.001) and more likely to be male (78% vs. 46%; p< 0.001) than were general surgery patients. Similar percentages of the two groups were infected (11% and 13%, respectively), and infections occurred after a similar number of days in the STICU. The mean maximum temperature on the day prior to diagnosis was higher in trauma patients (38.4℃ vs. 37.7℃; p < 0.001), and the mean leukocyte count was lower (13,500 vs. 15,800 10~6/L; p = 0.013). General surgery patients were more likely to be hypotensive (13% vs. 2%; p = 0.002) and to have a positive fluid balance >2L on the first day of infection (27% vs. 13%; p = 0.02). Respiratory infections were more common in trauma patients (40% vs. 7%; p < 0.001), and urinary tract infections were less common (19% vs. 36%; p = 0.011). Conclusion: Differences exist in how new infections manifest in trauma and general surgery patients in the ICU. General surgery patients appeared sicker on their first day of infection, as evidenced by a higher leukocyte count, lower blood pressure, and substantial positive fluid balance. Intensivists may need differing thresholds for triggering infection workups when employed in a mixed unit.
机译:背景:有效诊断感染是管理重症患者必不可少的。了解创伤患者和普通外科患者在新感染并发症的表现上是否以及如何不同可能会很有用。我们假设这些人群在重症监护病房(ICU)中的表现会有所不同。方法:我们分析了在21个月内从手术和创伤ICU(STICU)入院的所有1657名创伤和普通外科患者的前瞻性收集数据。比较了新诊断出的感染第一天的临床数据,包括创伤(占该系列的82%)和普通外科手术(占18%)的患者。结果:总共包括10,424 STICU天,并诊断出267例医院感染。与普通外科手术患者相比,创伤患者较年轻(50岁比62岁; p <0.001),男性更容易发生(78%vs. 46%; p <0.001)。两组中被感染的百分比相似(分别为11%和13%),并且在STICU中经过相似的天数后才发生感染。创伤患者诊断前一天的平均最高温度较高(38.4℃vs. 37.7℃; p <0.001),平均白细胞计数较低(13,500 vs. 15,800 10〜6 / L; p = 0.013) 。普通外科手术患者在感染的第一天更有可能降血压(13%vs. 2%; p = 0.002),体液平衡> 2L为阳性(27%vs. 13%; p = 0.02)。创伤患者中呼吸道感染较常见(40%vs. 7%; p <0.001),尿路感染较少见(19%vs. 36%; p = 0.011)。结论:ICU的创伤患者和普通外科患者在新感染的表现方式上存在差异。普外科手术患者在感染的第一天就显得病了,这由白细胞计数升高,血压降低和体液平衡显着证明。当在混合单位中使用时,强化医生可能需要不同的阈值来触发感染检查。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Surgical infections》 |2014年第4期|377-381|共5页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Surgery, MetroHealth Medical Center Campus, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio;

    Department of Surgery, MetroHealth Medical Center Campus, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio;

    Department of Surgery, MetroHealth Medical Center Campus, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio;

    Department of Computer and Information Science, Cleveland State University, Cleveland;

    Department of Surgery, MetroHealth Medical Center Campus, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio,Department of Computer and Information Science, Cleveland State University, Cleveland;

  • 收录信息 美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号