首页> 外文期刊>Surgical infections >Open-to-Air Is a Viable Option for Initial Wound Care in Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection that Allows Early Detection of Recurrence without Need for Painful Dressing Changes or Return to Operating Room
【24h】

Open-to-Air Is a Viable Option for Initial Wound Care in Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection that Allows Early Detection of Recurrence without Need for Painful Dressing Changes or Return to Operating Room

机译:露天治疗是坏死软组织感染初期伤口护理的可行选择,它可以及早发现复发,而无需换药或痛苦地回到手术室

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The standard treatment of necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI) includes extensive surgical debridement. Care of these debridements is challenging because of the size of the wound and associated pain. A potential solution is to leave the wounds open-to-air in the period after the initial debridement, allowing for regular inspection at bedside while reducing pain associated with frequent dressing changes. We evaluated the feasibility of this approach from a pain control standpoint. Patients and Methods: An audit of wound care modalities used on adult patients with NSTI admitted to a regional burn center between January 2009 and May 2014 was performed. Patients with at least one operation were included. Those opting for palliative care were excluded. Wound care was divided into four categories: open-to-air (OTA), negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT), packing, and ointment. Wound care, pain score, pain medication use, and number of operations were collected for the first seven days after initial debridement. Pain management was assessed by pain scores. Analgesic use was measured and compared using conversion to morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Results: Ninety-six patients were included; 67% were men with average age of 50 years, resulting in a total of 672 days of wound care evaluated: 69 days of OTA, 127 days of NPWT, 200 days of packing, and 126 days of ointment (150 days were undocumented). Average daily pain score from all wound care modalities was 2.00. Negative pressure wound therapy had the highest reported daily pain score (2.18, p = 0.034), whereas OTA had the lowest pain score (1.63, p < 0.05). Mortality was lower in the OTA cohort but was not statistically significant; there were no other differences in long-term outcome. Conclusion: Leaving wounds OTA is a safe and viable option in the immediate post-debridement period of NSTI to reduce pain, while permitting frequent re-evaluation for quick recognition of disease progression and repeat operative debridement if necessary.
机译:背景: 坏死性软组织感染(NSTI)的标准治疗包括广泛的外科清创术。由于伤口的大小和相关的疼痛,这些清创术的护理具有挑战性。一种潜在的解决方案是在初次清创后的一段时间内使伤口保持开放状态,以便在床旁进行定期检查,同时减少与频繁换药有关的疼痛。我们从控制疼痛的角度评估了这种方法的可行性。 患者和方法: 对2009年1月至2014年5月期间进入区域烧伤中心的NSTI成年患者使用的伤口护理方式进行了审核。包括至少一项手术的患者。那些选择姑息治疗的人被排除在外。伤口护理分为四类:露天(OTA),负压伤口治疗(NPWT),包装和药膏。最初清创后的前7天收集伤口护理,疼痛评分,止痛药的使用以及手术次数。通过疼痛评分评估疼痛管理。测量了镇痛剂的使用并比较了吗啡毫克当量(MME)的转化率。 结果: 纳入了96例患者。 67%是平均年龄为50岁的男性,总共评估了672天的伤口护理:OTA 69天,NPWT 127天,包装200天和药膏126天(未记录150天)。所有伤口护理方式的平均每日疼痛评分为2.00。负压伤口疗法的每日疼痛评分最高(2.18,p = 0.034),而OTA最低疼痛评分(1.63,p <0.05)。在OTA队列中死亡率较低,但无统计学意义。长期结果没有其他差异。 结论: 在NSTI清创后立即进行OTA手术是安全可行的选择,以减轻疼痛,同时允许进行频繁的重新评估以快速识别疾病进展并在必要时重复手术清创术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号