How could models possibly provide how-possibly explanations?

摘要

One puzzle concerning highly idealized models is whether they explain. Some suggest they provide so-called 'how-possibly explanations'. However, this raises an important question about the nature of how possibly explanations, namely what distinguishes them from 'normal', or how-actually, explanations? I provide an account of how-possibly explanations that clarifies their nature in the context of solving the puzzle of model-based explanation. I argue that the modal notions of actuality and possibility provide the relevant dividing lines between how-possibly and how-actually explanations. Whereas how-possibly explanations establish claims of possible explanations, how-actually explanations establish claims of actual ones. Models, in turn, simply provide evidence for these claims. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.