...
首页> 外文期刊>Studies in Health Technology and Informatics >Comparison of Direct and Indirect Nursing-care Times between Physician Order Entry System and Electronic Medical Records
【24h】

Comparison of Direct and Indirect Nursing-care Times between Physician Order Entry System and Electronic Medical Records

机译:医嘱输入系统和电子病历之间直接和间接护理时间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study compared the amount of time spent by nursing personnel on direct and indirect nursing care between a physician order entry (POE) system and an electronic medical record (EMR) system. Nursing-care time was measured by direct observation or a self-reporting method, both using a stopwatch. Nursing activities were categorized according to modified versions of the tools reported by Park. The implementation of an EMR system increased the direct nursing-care times for all nursing positions. However, the indirect nursing-care times of head nurses and nurse aids was lower, whereas that of registered nurses was higher, and the direct and indirect nursing-care times of RNs varied with the nursing unit and shift. The increases in direct nursing times, especially that spent by nurses providing descriptions and education to patients at their bedside, led to a global improvement in the nursing quality, and the indirect nursing times varied with the nursing position.
机译:这项研究比较了护理人员花费在医生指令输入(POE)系统和电子病历(EMR)系统之间的直接和间接护理上的时间。护理时间通过秒表或直接观察或自我报告的方法进行测量。根据Park报告的工具的修改版本对护理活动进行了分类。 EMR系统的实施增加了所有护理职位的直接护理时间。但是,护士长和护士辅助人员的间接护理时间较短,而注册护士的间接护理时间较高,而RNs的直接和间接护理时间随护理单位和班次的变化而变化。直接护理时间的增加,特别是护士在床边为患者提供描述和教育的花费,导致护理质量的整体改善,间接护理时间随护理职位而变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号