首页> 外文期刊>Studies in East European Thought >Radical sophiology: Fr. Sergej Bulgakov and John Milbank on Augustine
【24h】

Radical sophiology: Fr. Sergej Bulgakov and John Milbank on Augustine

机译:自由基物理学:神父。 Sergej Bulgakov和John Milbank在奥古斯丁

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Looking at John Milbank’s recent turn to Fr. Sergej Bulgakov, this paper argues that the theological and philosophical commitments they share are overshadowed by a deeper difference concerning the role each assigns the church in secular culture. It turns to Milbank’s roots in Augustine’s philosophy of history, which he argues could have allowed the church to overtake the pagan (which founds the secular) were it not for his distinction between the “visible” church and its deferred (eschatological) perfection. Bulgakov also criticizes Augustine’s doctrine of the church, or so he thinks. He actually misreads Augustine, accusing the bishop of holding a doctrine of the church that Milbank would have liked him to have held. This suggests that Bulgakov would not agree with Milbank’s view that the church should “enact” God’s judgment in history by opposing itself to the secular.
机译:看约翰·米尔班克(John Milbank)最近转向神父。谢尔盖·布尔加科夫(Sergej Bulgakov)认为,他们在神学和哲学上的共同承诺被双方在教会在世俗文化中的角色分配上的更深层差异所掩盖。米尔班克的根源在于奥古斯丁的历史哲学,他认为,如果不是因为他在“有形”教会及其延缓的(思想上的)完美之间的区别,这可能会使教会超越异教徒(发现世俗的)。布尔加科夫还批评奥古斯丁关于教会的教义,或者他认为。他实际上误读了奥古斯丁,指责主教持有米尔班克希望他担任的教会教义。这表明布尔加科夫不同意米尔班克的观点,即教会应通过与世俗组织对立来“体现”上帝在历史上的审判。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号