首页> 外文期刊>Studies in Comparative International Development (SCID) >Doing Bad by Doing Good? Theft and Abuse by Lenders in the Microfinance Markets of Uganda
【24h】

Doing Bad by Doing Good? Theft and Abuse by Lenders in the Microfinance Markets of Uganda

机译:做好事坏事?乌干达小额信贷市场上贷款人的盗窃和滥用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Microcredit transactions in developing countries create risks for borrowers that are routinely overlooked in the literature. This paper argues that common microfinance-lending methodologies that allow lenders to collateralize loans and unilaterally collect this security create opportunities for malicious lenders to steal from clients in good standing. In places where any lender can simply call itself a "microfinance institution" (MFI), opportunistic lenders can use the halo effect associated with microfinance to encourage borrowers to make themselves unusually vulnerable to theft. Evidence of these abuses can be seen in a case study of Uganda, where theft and fraud by a small number of microfinance institutions created a large-scale crisis and contributed to a precipitous decline in trust in the financial sector as a whole. Even when it occurs only on the margins of the sector, I conclude, this type of opportunism may have problematic implications for all MFIs and undermine efforts to increase financial inclusion. This possibility provides a new impetus to consider innovative regulatory approaches for microfinance.
机译:发展中国家的小额信贷交易给借款人带来了风险,而这些风险在文献中通常被忽略。本文认为,允许贷方抵押贷款并单方面收集这种担保的常见的小额信贷借贷方法为恶意贷方从信誉良好的客户那里窃取机会提供了机会。在任何贷方都可以简单地称自己为“小额信贷机构”(MFI)的地方,机会主义贷方可以利用与小额信贷相关的光环效应来鼓励借款人异常地容易遭受盗窃。在乌干达的一个案例研究中可以看到这些滥用行为的证据,在该案例研究中,少数小额信贷机构的盗窃和欺诈行为造成了大规模危机,并导致对整个金融部门的信任急剧下降。我总结说,即使这种机会主义只发生在该部门的边缘,也可能对所有小额信贷机构产生问题,并破坏增加金融包容性的努力。这种可能性为考虑创新的小额信贷监管方法提供了新的动力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号