...
首页> 外文期刊>Studies in Comparative International Development (SCID) >Remittances, Regime Type, and Government Spending Priorities
【24h】

Remittances, Regime Type, and Government Spending Priorities

机译:汇款,制度类型和政府支出优先级

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Previous work suggests that remittances enable governments to reduce spending on public services and divert resources to serve their own interests. We argue this need not occur. Building on recent work which shows that the impact of remittances is contingent on the domestic environment in remittance-receiving countries, we hypothesize that (1) remittances are more likely to increase government spending on public services in democracies than in autocracies and (2) remittances are more likely to finance activities that deter political competition in autocracies than in democracies. Using a sample of 105 developing countries from 1985 through 2008, we find strong support for our hypotheses when examining the impact of remittances on public education, health, and military spending. We also provide suggestive evidence for the mechanism underpinning our results: micro-level evidence on remittance recipients' preferences and political engagement.
机译:先前的工作表明,汇款使政府能够减少在公共服务上的支出并转移用于自身利益的资源。我们认为这种情况不必发生。基于最近的工作表明汇款的影响取决于汇款接收国的国内环境,我们假设(1)民主制比民主国家更容易增加政府在公共服务方面的政府支出,以及(2)汇款比民主国家更有可能资助阻止专制国家政治竞争的活动。我们使用1985年至2008年的105个发展中国家作为样本,在检验汇款对公共教育,卫生和军事支出的影响时,我们的假设得到了强有力的支持。我们还提供了支持我们研究结果的机制的暗示性证据:有关汇款接受者偏好和政治参与的微观证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号