首页> 外文期刊>Studies in Comparative International Development (SCID) >Measuring Polyarchy Across the Globe, 1900-2017
【24h】

Measuring Polyarchy Across the Globe, 1900-2017

机译:1900-2017年,在全球范围内衡量多元体系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper presents a new measure polyarchy for a global sample of 182 countries from 1900 to 2017 based on the Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) data, deriving from an expert survey of more than 3000 country experts from around the world, with on average 5 experts rating each indicator. By measuring the five components of Elected Officials, Clean Elections, Associational Autonomy, Inclusive Citizenship, and Freedom of Expression and Alternative Sources of Informationseparately, we anchor this new index directly in Dahl's (1971) extremely influential theoretical framework. The paper describes how the five polyarchy components were measured and provides the rationale for how to aggregate them to the polyarchy scale. We find that personal characteristics or ideological predilections of the V-Dem country experts do not systematically predict their ratings on our indicators. We also find strong correlations with other existing measures of electoral democracy, but also decisive differences where we believe the evidence supports the polyarchy index having higher face validity.
机译:本文基于民主多样性(V-Dem)数据,从1900年至2017年的182个国家的全球样本中,提出了一种新的测度多头制,该数据来自于全球3000多个国家专家的专家调查,平均5位专家对每个指标进行评级。通过分别衡量当选官员,廉洁选举,协会自治,包容性公民,言论自由和替代信息来源的五个组成部分,我们将该新指数直接固定在达尔(1971)极具影响力的理论框架中。本文介绍了如何测量五个多级体系组成部分,并提供了将它们汇总到多级体系规模的基本原理。我们发现,V-Dem国家专家的个人特征或意识形态上的偏爱并未系统地预测其对我们指标的评级。我们还发现与其他现有的选举民主措施具有很强的相关性,但是在我们认为证据支持具有较高面孔效度的多层次指数方面也具有决定性差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号