首页> 外文期刊>Structural Safety >When is the observational method in geotechnical engineering favourable?
【24h】

When is the observational method in geotechnical engineering favourable?

机译:什么是岩土工程中的观测方法?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The observational method in geotechnical engineering is an acceptable verification method for limit states in Eurocode 7, but the method is rarely used despite its potential savings. Some reasons may be its unclear safety definition and the lack of guidelines on how to establish whether the observational method is more favourable than conventional design. In this paper, we challenge these issues by introducing a reliability constraint on the observational method and propose a probabilistic optimization methodology that aids the decision-making engineer in choosing between the observational method and conventional design. The methodology suggests an optimal design after comparing the expected utilities of the considered design options. The methodology is illustrated with a practical example, in which a geotechnical engineer evaluates whether the observational method may be favourable in the design of a rock pillar. We conclude that the methodology may prove to be a valuable tool for decision-making engineers' everyday work with managing risks in geotechnical projects. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:在欧洲规范7中,岩土工程中的观测方法是极限状态的可接受的验证方法,但是尽管具有潜在的节约功能,但很少使用。某些原因可能是其安全性定义不清楚,以及缺乏有关如何确定观察方法是否比常规设计更有利的指导原则。在本文中,我们通过在观测方法上引入可靠性约束来挑战这些问题,并提出一种概率优化方法,以帮助决策工程师在观测方法和常规设计之间进行选择。该方法在比较了考虑的设计方案的预期效用之后,提出了最佳设计方案。通过一个实际的例子来说明该方法,在该示例中,岩土工程师评估了观察方法在岩柱设计中是否有利。我们得出的结论是,该方法可能被证明是决策工程师日常工作中管理岩土项目风险的宝贵工具。 (C)2017作者。由Elsevier Ltd.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号