首页> 外文期刊>Structural Safety >Multi-criteria robust optimization framework for bridge adaptation under climate change
【24h】

Multi-criteria robust optimization framework for bridge adaptation under climate change

机译:气候变化下桥梁适应的多准则鲁棒优化框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In order to adapt civil infrastructure to changing climate conditions, quantifiable and deep uncertainties must be integrated into the decision-making process. The quantifiable uncertainties, i.e. variability for which a likelihood can be defined, are typically integrated into the management process by considering the reliability or risk level of a structure. The deep uncertainties, i.e. the variability for which a likelihood cannot be defined, are beginning to be integrated in the decision making process as a few robust decision making procedures have been proposed. However, the deep uncertainty associated with the multiple feasible future climate scenarios also provokes a "wait and see" mentality for some decision makers, causing the flexibility of a strategy to be valued. This paper introduces the Gain-Loss Ratio (GLR) as a metric that systematically quantifies what may be gained by postponing adaptation while also considering what is lost with the delay. Additionally, bi-objective optimization models for optimizing bridge adaptation strategies under deep uncertainties are proposed; the advantages and disadvantages of each are highlighted as they pertain to the management of a typical riverine bridge. Two rivers are considered that have comparable climate change trends as those predicted for the Columbia and Mississippi Rivers. It is demonstrated that the desire for flexibility may be justified for certain locations, but may be detrimental in others.
机译:为了使民用基础设施适应不断变化的气候条件,必须将可量化的深层次不确定性纳入决策过程。通常通过考虑结构的可靠性或风险水平,将可量化的不确定性(即可以定义可能性的可变性)整合到管理过程中。由于提出了一些健壮的决策程序,深层的不确定性(即无法定义可能性的可变性)已开始纳入决策过程。但是,与多种可行的未来气候情景相关的深刻不确定性也激发了一些决策者的“等待观望”心态,从而使该战略的灵活性得到重视。本文介绍了增益/损耗比(GLR),它是系统地量化通过延迟自适应可能获得的收益,同时还考虑延迟带来的损失的度量。另外,提出了在深不确定性条件下优化桥梁适应策略的双目标优化模型。突出了每种优点和缺点,因为它们与典型河道桥的管理有关。据认为,两条河流的气候变化趋势与哥伦比亚河和密西西比河的预测趋势相当。事实证明,对于灵活性的需求可能在某些地方是合理的,但在其他地方可能是有害的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Structural Safety》 |2018年第2018期|14-23|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Lehigh Univ, ATLSS Engn Res Ctr, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 117 ATLSS Dr, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA;

    Lehigh Univ, ATLSS Engn Res Ctr, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 117 ATLSS Dr, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA;

    Lehigh Univ, ATLSS Engn Res Ctr, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 117 ATLSS Dr, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Adaptation; Climate change; Flexibility; Robust optimization; Bridge management;

    机译:适应;气候变化;灵活性;稳健优化;桥梁管理;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:18:46

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号