...
首页> 外文期刊>Structural change and economic dynamics >Financialization and industrial policies in Japan and Korea: Evolving institutional complementarities and loss of state capabilities
【24h】

Financialization and industrial policies in Japan and Korea: Evolving institutional complementarities and loss of state capabilities

机译:日本和韩国的经济和产业政策:不断发展的机构互补性和国家能力丧失

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this article is to analyze the revival of industrial policies from the late 2000 s in Japan and Korea and their limitations. Our approach has two major characteristics. First, we adopt the perspective of historical institutionalism to focus on the relation between IPs and financial systems and study their evolution over the last 40 years. Second, by mobilizing the concepts of institutional complementarities and hierarchy, we discuss the limits of this revival in a context of liberalized financial systems, to which government entities in charge of industrial policies have contributed. Our major result is that, in the context of financialization, past complementarities of the developmental state have weakened and contradictions have arisen. It resulted in a restructuration of state capabilities to design and implement industrial policies, and to its inability to subordinate finance to its goals, despite the discourses and ambitions of governments. However, and this is our second result, comparison between Japan and Korea also allows us to identify some significant differences in the initial institutional arrangements and in the process of institutional change, which are analyzed as sources of greater state capabilities in Korea than in Japan in the current period. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:本文的目的是分析日本和韩国2000年底的产业政策的复兴及其局限性。我们的方法有两个主要特征。首先,我们采取了历史制度主义的视角,专注于IPS和金融系统之间的关系,并在过去的40年里研究他们的进化。其次,通过动员机构互补性和等级的概念,我们讨论了在自由化金融系统的背景下讨论了这种复兴的极限,政府负责产业政策的政府贡献。我们的主要结果是,在经济规范的背景下,发展国家的过去的互补性削弱了,并出现了矛盾。它导致国家能力的重组设计和实施工业政策,尽管政府有道理和雄心壮志,但尽管政府的野蛮和雄心壮志,但它无法对其目标进行融资。然而,这是我们的第二个结果,日本和韩国之间的比较还使我们能够确定初始制度安排和体制变动过程中的一些显着差异,这些情况被分析为韩国更大的国家能力来源而不是日本目前的时期。 (c)2017年Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号