首页> 外文期刊>Strategic Organization >Are you 110% sure? Modeling of fractions and proportions in strategy and management research
【24h】

Are you 110% sure? Modeling of fractions and proportions in strategy and management research

机译:你有110%肯定吗?策略与管理研究中分数与比例的建模

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Many outcomes of interest to management and strategy researchers are in the form of fractions, proportions, or percentages. We review 10 years of research in seven leading strategy and management journals. Instead of implementing best-practice techniques, such as fractional logistic regression, management scholars rely primarily on linear regression, log-odds regression, or the Tobit model. Following up on our review, we present re-estimations of two published papers to show how best-practice methods yield substantially different results than the most commonly used methods. Using simulations, we confirm the results from the reproduced examples in a broader context. Finally, we present a worked example that researchers can lean on when they deal with fractional outcomes.
机译:管理和战略研究人员的许多结果是分数,比例或百分比的形式。我们在七个主要战略和管理期刊中回顾了10年的研究。而不是实现最佳实践技术,例如分数逻辑回归,管理学者依赖于线性回归,记录赔率回归或Tobit模型。跟进我们的评论后,我们展示了两个公布的论文的重新评估,以表明最佳实践方法如何产生与最常用的方法不同的结果。使用模拟,我们在更广泛的背景下确认了再现示例的结果。最后,我们提出了一个有效的例子,即研究人员在处理分数结果时可以依赖。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号