...
首页> 外文期刊>Strategic Organization >Revisiting James March (1991): Whither exploration and exploitation?
【24h】

Revisiting James March (1991): Whither exploration and exploitation?

机译:重访詹姆斯·马奇(James March)(1991年):进一步探索和利用?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We revisit March's seminal 1991 article, Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, and analyze the impact it has had on scholarly thinking, providing a comprehensive and structured review of the extensive and diverse research inspired by this publication. We show that although this influence has changed significantly over the years, there are still unexplored opportunities left by this seminal work. Our approach enables us to identify promising directions for future research that reinforce the themes anchored in March's article. In particular, we call for reconnecting current research to the behavioral roots of this article and uncovering the microfoundations of exploration and exploitation. Our analysis further identifies opportunities for integrating this framework with resource-based theories and considering how exploration and exploitation can be sourced and integrated within and across organizational boundaries. Finally, our analysis reveals prospects for extending the notions of exploration and exploitation to new domains, but we caution that such domains should be clearly delineated. We conclude with a call for further research on the antecedents of exploration and exploitation and for studying their underexplored dimensions.
机译:我们回顾了1991年3月的开创性文章《组织学习中的探索与利用》,并分析了它对学术思想的影响,对本出版物所激发的广泛而多样的研究进行了全面而结构化的综述。我们表明,尽管这种影响在过去几年中已发生了显着变化,但这项开创性工作仍然留下了未开发的机会。我们的方法使我们能够确定未来研究的有希望的方向,以加强3月份文章中锚定的主题。特别是,我们呼吁将当前的研究重新与本文的行为根源联系起来,并揭示勘探和开发的微观基础。我们的分析进一步确定了将该框架与基于资源的理论进行集成的机会,并考虑了如何在组织边界内和跨组织边界来进行探索和开发。最后,我们的分析揭示了将勘探和开发概念扩展到新领域的前景,但我们提醒您应明确界定这些领域。最后,我们呼吁对勘探和开发的先例进行进一步研究,并研究其未充分开发的规模。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号