首页> 外文期刊>Strategic Management Journal >THE ADVANTAGE OF FOREIGNNESS IN INNOVATION
【24h】

THE ADVANTAGE OF FOREIGNNESS IN INNOVATION

机译:创新的先见之明

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study analyzes differences in the innova-tiveness of subsidiaries of foreign multinational enterprises (MNEs) in comparison to domestic companies competing in the same country. There appear to be two conflicting views. On the one hand, some research has argued that subsidiaries of foreign MNEs (henceforth, 'subsidiaries') areat a disadvantage in comparison to domestic firms because they suffer from a cost of doing business abroad (Hymer, 1976) or a liability of foreignness (Zaheer, 1995). On the other hand, other studies assume that subsidiaries have a technological advantage over domestic firms because the former receive knowledge and technology from the MNE (e.g., Buckley and Casson, 1976; Vernon, 1966). Unfortunately, no studies have compared their innovativeness and, thus, we still debate about whether they differ and why, and we are unable to provide managers with proper guidance.I clarify the debate by linking technology strategy (e.g., Helfat, 1997; see a review in Fager-berg, Mowery, and Nelson, 2005) and neoinstitu-tional theory's application to the study of the MNE
机译:这项研究分析了与在同一国家竞争的国内公司相比,外国跨国公司(MNE)的子公司的创新性差异。似乎存在两种矛盾的观点。一方面,一些研究认为,与跨国公司相比,外国跨国公司的子公司(以下简称“子公司”)处于劣势,因为它们承受着在国外开展业务的成本(Hymer,1976年)或外国责任( Zaheer,1995年。另一方面,其他研究假设子公司比国内公司具有技术优势,因为子公司从跨国公司那里获得了知识和技术(例如Buckley和Casson,1976; Vernon,1966)。不幸的是,没有研究可以比较它们的创新性,因此,我们仍在争论它们是否不同以及原因为何,我们无法为管理人员提供适当的指导。我通过将技术战略联系起来澄清了这一争论(例如,Helfat,1997;参见Fager-berg,Mowery和Nelson,2005年综述)以及新制度理论在跨国公司研究中的应用

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号