首页> 外文期刊>Strategic Management Journal >WHO BRIBES? EVIDENCE FROM THE UNITED NATIONS' OIL-FOR-FOOD PROGRAM
【24h】

WHO BRIBES? EVIDENCE FROM THE UNITED NATIONS' OIL-FOR-FOOD PROGRAM

机译:谁贿赂?联合国粮食换油计划的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

How do managers react in an environment where bribery is likely to bring high rewards, but also presents high risks? We examine the supply side (firms' illicit payments) of bribery in a global setting, using the United Nations' (UN) Oil-for-Food Program, part of UN sanctions on Iraq. Some companies helped Iraq circumvent UN sanctions through bribe payments in the form of illicit surcharges. Our transaction-level analysis of factors affecting bribe payments draws on the economic theory of crime, agency theory, and home country institutions. Results suggest that firms pay larger bribes when there are stronger financial and managerial incentives, but pay less when their home countries have implemented the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention. We find little relationship between a widely used country-level corruption perception index and firms' actual bribery.
机译:在贿赂可能带来高额回报但又带来高风险的环境中,管理人员应如何应对?我们使用联合国(UN)石油换食品计划(这是联合国对伊拉​​克实施制裁的一部分),在全球范围内研究了贿赂的供应方(企业的非法付款)。一些公司通过以非法附加费的形式贿赂来帮助伊拉克规避联合国的制裁。我们对影响贿赂支付的因素进行交易级别的分析,是基于犯罪的经济理论,代理理论和母国制度。结果表明,在有更强的财务和管理激励措施的情况下,公司支付的贿赂额较大,但在其母国执行《经合组织反贿赂公约》的情况下,支付的贿赂额较少。我们发现,广泛使用的国家层面的腐败感知指数与企业的实际贿赂之间几乎没有关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号