首页> 外文期刊>Strategic Management Journal >Is there a 'Dark Side' to Monitoring? Board and Shareholder Monitoring Effects on M&A Performance Extremeness
【24h】

Is there a 'Dark Side' to Monitoring? Board and Shareholder Monitoring Effects on M&A Performance Extremeness

机译:监控是否有“阴暗面”?董事会和股东监督对并购绩效极端性的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Research summary: We investigate the effects of monitoring by boards of directors and institutional shareholders on merger and acquisition (M&A) performance extremeness using a sample of M&A deals from 1997 to 2006. Both governance research and legal reforms generally have espoused a raise all boats view of monitoring. We instead investigate whether monitoring may serve as a double-edged sword that limits CEO discretion to undertake both value-destroying M&A deals and value-creating ones. Our findings indicate that the relationship between monitoring and M&A performance is more complex than previously believed. Rather than raising all boats in a shift towards better M&A outcomes, monitoring instead is associated with lower M&A losses, but also with lower M&A gains.
机译:研究摘要:我们以1997年至2006年的并购交易为样本,研究了董事会和机构股东的监督对并购(M&A)绩效极端性的影响。治理研究和法律改革总体上都支持所有观点。监控。我们取而代之的是,调查监控是否可能是一把双刃剑,从而限制了首席执行官对进行破坏价值的并购交易和创造价值的交易的酌处权。我们的发现表明,监控与并购绩效之间的关系比以前认为的更为复杂。监控并没有使所有的船只都转向更好的并购结果,而是与并购损失减少,并购收益减少有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号