【24h】

IS R&D RISKY?

机译:研发风险吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Many studies use research and development (R&D) intensity or R&D spending as a proxy for risk taking, but we have little evidence that either associates positively with firm risk. We analyze the relations between R&D intensity (R&D spending to sales) and R&D spending on the one hand and 11 different indicators of firm risk on the other, using data from 1,907 to 3,908 firms in various industries over 13 years. The analysis finds a general lack of consistent positive association between R&D and firm risk, making the use of R&D as an indicator of risk taking questionable. Furthermore, R&D intensity and spending do not correlate positively, suggesting they measure different constructs. We discuss potential reasons for these nonsignificant results. Our study demonstrates that researchers should avoid casual use of R&D as a proxy for risk taking without explicitly providing a clear definition and measurement model for risk.
机译:许多研究使用研究与开发(R&D)强度或R&D支出作为承担风险的指标,但我们几乎没有证据表明两者与公司风险呈正相关。我们一方面使用13年中各个行业的1,907家至3,908家公司的数据,一方面分析了R&D强度(R&D支出对销售)与R&D支出之间的关系,另一方面分析了11种不同的企业风险指标。分析发现,研发与公司风险之间通常缺乏一致的正相关性,这使得将研发作为风险承担指标的使用存在疑问。此外,研发强度和支出之间没有正相关关系,表明它们衡量的是不同的结构。我们讨论了产生这些不重要结果的潜在原因。我们的研究表明,研究人员应避免随意使用R&D作为承担风险的代理,而不必明确提供明确的风险定义和衡量模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号