REAFFIRMING THE CEO EFFECT IS SIGNIFICANT AND MUCH LARGER THAN CHANCE: A COMMENT ON FITZA (2014)

摘要

A recent study by Fitza argued that the prior estimates of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) effect are conflated with events outside the CEO's control, are largely the result of random chance, and that the true CEO effect is smaller than has been previously estimated. We suggest that the empirical methodology employed by Fitza to support these claims substantially overstates the "random chance" element of the CEO effect. We replicate Fitza's findings, highlight methodological issues, offer alternative conclusions, and using multilevel modeling (MLM), suggest that his analyses mischaracterize the CEO effect. Copyright (C) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.