首页> 外文期刊>Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment >Short term rainfall-runoff modelling using several machine learning methods and a conceptual event-based model
【24h】

Short term rainfall-runoff modelling using several machine learning methods and a conceptual event-based model

机译:使用多种机器学习方法和基于概念事件的模型短期降雨 - 径流建模

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The applicability of four machine learning (ML) methods, ANFIS-PSO, ANFIS-FCM, MARS and M5Tree, together with multi model simple averaging (MM-SA) ensemble method, is investigated in rainfall-runoff modeling at hourly timescale. The results are compared with the conceptual EBA4SUB model using rainfall and runoff data from Samoggia River basin, Italy. The capability of the methods is measured using five statistics, Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency, root mean squared error, mean absolute error, scatter index, and adjusted index of agreement. Comparison of single ML reveals that the ANFIS-PSO, ANFIS-FCM and MARS produce similar accuracy which is better than the M5Tree model. MM-SA ensemble model improves the accuracy of ANFIS-PSO, ANFIS-FCM, MARS and M5Tree models with respect to RMSE by 8.5%, 5%, 7.4% and 28.8%, respectively. Comparison with the conceptual event-based method indicates that the ML methods generally performs superior to the EBA4SUB; however, latter method provides better accuracy than the M5Tree and MARS in some cases.[GRAPHICS].
机译:四个机器学习(ML)方法,ANFIS-PSO,ANFIS-FCM,MARS和M5Tree的适用性以及多模型简单平均(MM-SA)集合方法,在每小时计时的降雨径流建模中调查。将结果与来自意大利Samoggia River盆地的降雨和径流数据进行比较的概念性EBA4SUB模型。使用五个统计,NASH-SUTCLIFFE效率,根均方误差,平均绝对误差,散射指数和调整后的协议指数来测量该方法的能力。单毫升的比较显示,ANFIS-PSO,ANFIS-FCM和MARS产生类似的准确性,比M5Tree模型更好。 MM-SA集合模型可分别提高ANFIS-PSO,ANFIS-FCM,MARS和M5TREE模型的准确性,分别为RMSE分别为8.5%,5%,7.4%和28.8%。与基于概念事件的方法的比较表明ML方法通常以优于EBA4SUB执行;然而,在某些情况下,后一种方法提供比M5tree和MARS更好的准确性。[图形]。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号