...
首页> 外文期刊>Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment >The adaptability of typical precipitation ensemble prediction systems in the Huaihe River basin, China
【24h】

The adaptability of typical precipitation ensemble prediction systems in the Huaihe River basin, China

机译:淮河盆地典型降水集合预测系统的适应性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Evaluating the adaptability of precipitation forecasting is of great importance for regional flood control and drought warnings. This study conducted evaluations using the 1-9 days cumulative precipitation forecast data of five typical operational global ensemble prediction systems (EPSs) from TIGGE (i.e., The Observing System Research and Predictability Experiment Interactive Grand Global Ensemble) and the observed daily precipitation data of 40 meteorological stations over the Huaihe River basin (HB). A series of verification metrics is used to evaluate the performances of quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPFs) and probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasts (PQPFs) from the five EPSs from April to December 2015 in terms of overall performance, different precipitation thresholds, different lead times and the spatial distribution over the HB. The adaptability of the multimodel superensemble integrated from the five EPSs by the Bayesian model average is also examined during the main flood season. The results show that (1) the forecast quality of the China Meteorological Administration EPS is the worst for all lead times, which may relate to its having the fewest ensemble members. The European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) EPS performs the best in terms of QPF and PQPF qualities for longer lead times because ECMWF has the largest ensemble members. (2) All EPSs have better discrimination at low thresholds, indicating the reference value for drought warnings. ECMWF is expected to obtain the best PQPF skill for a large threshold through postprocessing; (3) due to the differences in climates in the North and South of the basin, QPF and PQPF qualities are better in the northern HB than in the southern HB; (4) except for climate, the PQPF skill is also influenced by precipitation type, while the QPF accuracy is affected by terrain. The PQPF is good at forecasting the precipitation caused by ocean effects but not by mountain topography. The QPF accuracy decreases in mountainous areas; and (5) the multimodel superensemble has little effect on PQPF skill improvement but can improve QPF accuracy when raw EPSs have significantly different QPF accuracies.
机译:评估降水预测的适应性对于区域防洪和干旱警告具有重要意义。本研究通过TIGGE(即观察系统研究和可预测实验互动GROAN GROANG GRALL GROAL GROANG GRALL GROAL GROANG GROANG GROANG GROANG GROANG GROANG GROANG GROANG GROANG GROANG GROANG GROANG GROANG GROANG GROANG GROANG GROANG GROANG GRAM GROANG GROAN)对评估进行了评估,使用五个典型的运营全球集合预测系统(EPS)(即观察系统研究和可预测实验互动大全球合奏)以及40的日常降水数据淮河流域(HB)的气象站。一系列验证指标用于评估从2015年4月到2015年12月的五次EPS的定量降水预测(QPFS)和概率定量降水预测(PQPF)的性能,在整体绩效,不同的降水阈值,不同的交货时间和Hb上的空间分布。在主要的汛期,还检查了贝叶斯模型平均水平的五元素超级综合的适应性。结果表明,(1)中国气象学局的预测质量是所有交货时间最糟糕的,这可能与其拥有最少的合并成员有关。欧洲中等地区天气预报中心(ECMWF)EPS在QPF和PQPF品质方面表现最佳,因为ECMWF拥有最大的集合成员。 (2)所有EPS都有更好的低阈值歧视,表明干旱警告的参考价值。预计ECMWF将通过后处理来获得大阈值的最佳PQPF技能; (3)由于盆地北部和南部的气候差异,QPF和PQPF品质在北部HB中比南部HB更好; (4)除气候外,PQPF技能也受降水类型的影响,而QPF精度受到地形的影响。 PQPF擅长预测海洋效应而不是山地地形造成的降水。近山区的QPF精度降低; (5)多模型超级型对PQPF技能的影响几乎没有影响,但是当原始EPS具有显着不同的QPF精度时,可以提高QPF精度。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号