...
首页> 外文期刊>Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment >Flash-flood Potential Index mapping using weights of evidence, decision Trees models and their novel hybrid integration
【24h】

Flash-flood Potential Index mapping using weights of evidence, decision Trees models and their novel hybrid integration

机译:使用证据权重,决策树模型及其新颖的混合集成进行洪水泛洪潜力指数映射

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Flash-floods are among the natural risk phenomena that annually cause important material damages and losses of human lives worldwide. One of the main activities for mitigating the negative effects of these phenomena consist of the identification and spatial representation of the surfaces prone to surface runoff occurrence. Flash-Flood Potential Index (FFPI) is the common method used to assess the degree of susceptibility to flash-floods of a certain surface. The main drawback of the aforementioned method is represented by the fact that, in the majority of the studies, the geographical factors considered for FFPI calculation received equal weights, even if they do not influence in the same measure the surface runoff process. Moreover, within the methodologies developed in the previous studies, the areas affected by torrential phenomena have not been considered for FFPI computation. To address these shortcomings, in the present study, FFPI values are estimated by using a number of 4 stand-alone models (Alternating Decision Tree (ADT), Rotation Forest, Weights of Evidence (WOE), Logistic Model Tree) and 3 hybrid models generated by the integration of WOE model with each of the other decision tree-based algorithms. The first stage of the study consisted of the inventory of the areas where torrential phenomena occurred in the past, 70% of them being included in the training sample, while the others 30% in the validating sample. Further, 12 flash-flood conditioning factors, selected through the correlation-based feature selection algorithm, were used to train the 7 models applied for FFPI calculation. The results of the 7 models revealed that the surfaces with a high and very high flash-flood susceptibility occupy between 23.3 and 43.7% of the entire study zone. The ROC Curve method was involved in the models performance assessment and in the results validation procedure. From this point of view, the best results were obtained by the ADT-WOE hybrid model.
机译:洪水是每年都会在世界范围内造成重大物质损失和生命损失的自然风险现象之一。减轻这些现象的负面影响的主要活动之一是对容易产生地表径流的地表进行识别和空间表征。泛洪潜力指数(FFPI)是用于评估特定表面的泛洪敏感性程度的常用方法。前述方法的主要缺点是,在大多数研究中,即使在相同的测量方法中不影响地表径流过程,在进行FFPI计算时考虑的地理因素也具有相等的权重。此外,在先前研究中开发的方法中,尚未考虑到受洪流现象影响的区域进行FFPI计算。为了解决这些缺点,在本研究中,FFPI值是通过使用4种独立模型(交替决策树(ADT),轮换森林,证据权重(WOE),逻辑模型树)和3种混合模型来估算的通过将WOE模型与其他基于决策树的算法集成而生成。研究的第一阶段包括对过去发生洪流现象的区域进行清点,其中70%包含在训练样本中,而其他30%包含在验证样本中。此外,通过基于相关性的特征选择算法选择的12个潮洪条件因子被用来训练7种用于FFPI计算的模型。 7个模型的结果表明,闪蒸敏感性高和非常高的表面占整个研究区域的23.3%至43.7%。 ROC曲线方法参与了模型性能评估和结果验证过程。从这个角度来看,ADT-WOE混合模型获得了最佳结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号