首页> 外文期刊>Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment >Storage-yield analysis of surface water reservoirs: the role of reliability constraints and operating policies
【24h】

Storage-yield analysis of surface water reservoirs: the role of reliability constraints and operating policies

机译:地表水储量的产量分析:可靠性约束和操作策略的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Stochastic optimization methods are used for optimal design and operation of surface water reservoir systems under uncertainty. Chance-constrained (CC) optimization with linear decision rules (LDRs) is an old approach for determining the minimum reservoir capacity required to meet a specific yield at a target level of reliability. However, this approach has been found to overestimate the reservoir capacity. In this paper, we propose the reason for this overestimation to be the fact that the reliability constraints considered in standard CC LDR models do not have the same meaning as in other models such as reservoir operation simulation models. The simulation models have fulfilled a target reliability level in an average sense (i.e., annually), whereas the standard CC LDR models have met the target reliability level every season of the year. Mixed integer nonlinear programs are presented to clarify the distinction between the two types of reliability constraints and demonstrate that the use of seasonal reliability constraints, rather than an average reliability constraint, leads to 80-150 % and 0-32 % excess capacity for SQ-type and S-type CC LDR models, respectively. Additionally, a modified CC LDR model with an average reliability constraint is proposed to overcome the reservoir capacity overestimation problem. In the second stage, we evaluate different operating policies and show that for the seasonal (average) reliability constraints, open-loop, S-type, standard operating policy, SQ-type, and general SQ-type policies compared to a model not using any operation rule lead to 190-460 % (200-550 %), 100-200 % (80-300 %), 0-90 % (0-60 %), 30-90 % (0-20 %), and 10-90 % (0-10 %) excess capacity, respectively.
机译:随机优化方法用于不确定性条件下地表水系统的优化设计和运行。具有线性决策规则(LDR)的机会约束(CC)优化是一种老方法,用于确定在目标可靠性水平上满足特定产量所需的最小油藏容量。但是,已经发现这种方法高估了储层容量。在本文中,我们提出这种高估的原因是,在标准CC LDR模型中考虑的可靠性约束与其他模型(例如油藏运行模拟模型)的含义并不相同。模拟模型在一般意义上(即每年)都达到了目标可靠性水平,而标准CC LDR模型在一年中的每个季节都达到了目标可靠性水平。提出了混合整数非线性程序以阐明两种类型的可靠性约束之间的区别,并表明使用季节性可靠性约束(而不是平均可靠性约束)会导致SQ-的过剩容量达到80-150%和0-32%型和S型CC LDR模型。此外,提出了一种具有平均可靠性约束的改进CC LDR模型,以克服水库容量过高的问题。在第二阶段,我们评估了不同的操作策略,并显示了与季节性(平均)可靠性约束相比,与未使用模型的模型相比,开环,S型,标准操作策略,SQ类型和常规SQ类型策略任何操作规则都会导致190-460%(200-550%),100-200%(80-300%),0-90%(0-60%),30-90%(0-20%)和剩余容量分别为10-90%(0-10%)。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology (Polytechnic of Tehran), 424 Hafez Ave., P.O. Box: 15875-4413, Tehran, Iran;

    School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Narmak, P.O. Box: 1684613114, Tehran, Iran;

    Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号