首页> 外文期刊>Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research >Strictly Standardized Mean Difference, Standardized Mean Difference and Classical t-test for the Comparison of Two Groups
【24h】

Strictly Standardized Mean Difference, Standardized Mean Difference and Classical t-test for the Comparison of Two Groups

机译:严格的标准化均值差,标准化均值差和经典t检验以比较两组

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Statistical significance or p-value of t-test for testing mean difference has been widely used for the comparison of two groups. However, because of many issues that the statistical significance has, it has been intensively criticized in medical and social sciences. Consequently, effect sizes such as Cohena??s d have been proposed as an alternative to statistical significance. Recently, strictly standardized mean difference (SSMD) has been proposed for the comparison of two groups with applications in data analysis in high-throughput screening experiments. In this article, from a theoretical basis, I explore the relationships between SSMD, standardized mean difference, and p-value of classical t-test for comparing two groups. The relationships among these measures hint that SSMD may serve as an alternative to statistical significance in medical sciences and as an alternative to traditional effect sizes in social sciences.
机译:检验均数差异的t检验的统计显着性或p值已广泛用于两组的比较。但是,由于统计意义具有许多问题,因此在医学和社会科学领域受到了强烈的批评。因此,已经提出了诸如CohenaΔsd的效应量作为统计显着性的替代方法。最近,已经提出了严格标准化的均值差(SSMD),用于比较两组数据,并将其用于高通量筛选实验中的数据分析。在本文中,从理论基础上,我探索了SSMD,标准化均值差和经典t检验的p值之间的关系,以比较两组。这些措施之间的关系表明,SSMD可以替代医学科学中的统计意义,也可以替代社会科学中传统效应的大小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号