首页> 外文期刊>Statistical Methods and Applications >Detection of biomass change in a Norwegian mountain forest area using small footprint airborne laser scanner data
【24h】

Detection of biomass change in a Norwegian mountain forest area using small footprint airborne laser scanner data

机译:使用小尺寸机载激光扫描仪数据检测挪威山区森林地区生物量的变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Different approaches for estimation of change in biomass between two points in time by means of airborne laser scanner data were tested. Both field and laser data were collected at two occasions on 52 sample plots in a mountain forest in southeastern Norway. In the first approach, biomass change was estimated as the difference between predicted biomass for the two measurement occasions. Joint models for the biomass at both occasions were fitted using different height and density variables from laser data as explanatory variables. The second approach modelled the observed change directly using the change in different variables extracted from the laser data as explanatory variables. In the third approach we modelled the relative change in biomass. The explanatory variables were also expressed as relative change between measurement occasions. In all approaches we allowed spline terms to be entered. We also investigated the aptness of models for which the residual variance was modeled by allowing it to be proportional to the area of the plot on which biomass was assessed. All alternative models were initially assessed by AIC. All models were also evaluated by estimating biomass change on the model development data. This evaluation indicated that the two direct approaches (approach 2 and 3) were better than relying on modeling biomass at both occasions and taking change as the difference between biomass estimates. Approach 2 seemed to be slightly better than approach 3 based on assessments of bias in the evaluation.
机译:测试了通过航空激光扫描仪数据估算两个时间点之间生物量变化的不同方法。在挪威东南部的一片山林中,在52个样地上两次采集了场和激光数据。在第一种方法中,将生物量变化估算为两次测量时所预测的生物量之间的差异。使用来自激光数据的不同高度和密度变量作为解释变量,拟合了两种情况下生物量的联合模型。第二种方法使用从激光数据中提取的不同变量的变化作为解释变量,直接对观察到的变化建模。在第三种方法中,我们对生物量的相对变化建模。解释变量也表示为测量场合之间的相对变化。在所有方法中,我们都允许输入样条项。我们还研究了模型的适用性,该模型通过允许其与评估生物量的样区面积成正比来建模残余方差。所有替代模型最初都是由AIC评估的。还通过在模型开发数据上估算生物量变化来评估所有模型。该评估表明,两种直接方法(方法2和3)都比在两种情况下都依赖于对生物质建模并以变化作为生物量估计之间的差异更好。根据评估偏差的评估,方法2似乎比方法3更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号