...
首页> 外文期刊>The stata journal >When to consult precision-recall curves
【24h】

When to consult precision-recall curves

机译:何时查询精确调用曲线

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves are commonly used to evaluate predictions of binary outcomes. When there is a small percentage of items of interest (as would be the case with fraud detection, for example), ROC curves can provide an inflated view of performance. This can cause challenges in determining which set of predictions is better. In this article, we discuss the conditions under which precision-recall curves may be preferable to ROC curves. As an illustrative example, we compare two commonly used fraud predictors (Beneish's [1999, Financial Analysts Journal 55: 24-36] M score and Dechow et al.'s [2011, Contemporary Accounting Research 28: 17-82] F score) using both ROC and precision-recall curves. To aid the reader with using precision-recall curves, we also introduce the command prcurve to plot them.
机译:接收器工作特性(ROC)曲线通常用于评估二进制结果的预测。当感兴趣的项目所占比例很小时(例如,欺诈检测就是这种情况),ROC曲线可以提供出色的绩效视图。这可能会给确定哪一组预测更好带来挑战。在本文中,我们讨论了精确调用曲线可能优于ROC曲线的条件。作为说明性示例,我们比较了两个常用的欺诈预测因子(Beneish [1999,Financial Analysts Journal 55:24-36] M得分和Dechow等人[2011,当代会计研究28:17-82] F得分)同时使用ROC和精确调用曲线。为了帮助读者使用精确调用曲线,我们还引入了prcurve命令来绘制它们。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号