首页> 外文期刊>OR Spektrum >Supply chain coordination by risk sharing contracts under random production yield and deterministic demand
【24h】

Supply chain coordination by risk sharing contracts under random production yield and deterministic demand

机译:在随机产量和确定性需求下通过风险共享合同进行供应链协调

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

From numerous contributions to literature we know that properly designed contracts can facilitate coordinated decision making of multiple actors in a supply chain (SC) so that efficiency losses for the whole SC can be avoided. In a newsvendor-type SC with stochastic demand it is well-known that the double marginalization effect hampers the simple wholesale price contract to achieve coordination. More complex contracts however can bring about coordination, especially those which enable appropriate sharing of risks between the actors. While the effectiveness of risk sharing contracts is well understood for SC situations with random demand and reliable supply, less is known about respective problems if demand is deterministic but supply is unreliable due to random production yield. This paper shows how in a buyer-supplier SC the distribution of risks affects the coordination of buyer's ordering and supplier's production decision in a basic random yield, deterministic demand setting. Both parties are exposed to risks of over-production or under-delivery, respectively, if a simple wholesale price contract is applied. The resulting risk distribution always impedes SC coordination. However, more sophisticated contract types which penalize or reward the supplier can change risk distribution so that SC coordination is possible under random yield. Additionally, it is proven that the wholesale price contract will guarantee SC coordination if the supplier has a second (emergency) procurement source that is more costly, but reliable. Moreover, it is shown that under wholesale price contracts it can be beneficial to utilize this emergency source even if it is unprofitable from a SC perspective. However, if such an emergency option is available to the buyer as opposed to the supplier, a wholesale price contract will not be able to coordinate the SC.
机译:从对文献的大量贡献中我们知道,设计合理的合同可以促进供应链(SC)中多个参与者的协调决策,从而可以避免整个SC的效率损失。在具有随机需求的新闻供应商型供应链中,众所周知,双重边缘化效应阻碍了简单的批发价格合同的达成。但是,更复杂的合同可以带来协调,特别是那些使参与者之间适当分担风险的合同。尽管对于具有随机需求和可靠供应的供应链合作情形,风险分担合同的有效性已广为人知,但如果需求是确定性的,但由于随机生产产量而供应不可靠,则对各个问题的了解较少。本文说明在基本随机产量(确定性需求设置)中,买方-供应商SC中的风险分配如何影响买方订购和供应商生产决策的协调。如果应用简单的批发价格合同,则双方分别面临生产过剩或交付不足的风险。由此产生的风险分配始终会阻碍SC协调。但是,惩罚或奖励供应商的更复杂的合同类型可以改变风险分配,从而可以在随机收益的情况下协调供应链。此外,事实证明,如果供应商有第二个(紧急)采购源,价格更高但更可靠,批发价格合同将保证供应链协调。此外,研究表明,根据批发价合同,即使从供应链管理角度来看无利可图,利用这种应急来源也可能是有益的。但是,如果买方(而不是供应商)可以使用这种紧急选择,那么批发价格合同将无法协调供应链。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号