首页> 外文期刊>Space Weather >Validating the Rice neural network and the wing Kp real-time models
【24h】

Validating the Rice neural network and the wing Kp real-time models

机译:验证Rice神经网络和机翼Kp实时模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Rice neural network models of Kp have been running in real time at http://mms.rice.edu/realtime/forecast.html since October 2007; Dst and AE models were added to our operations in May 2010. All these models use the Boyle index as basis functions computed from ACE real time inputs. Later, two more driving functions were included in November 2012: (a) the “Ram” functions that had dynamic pressure term added to the Boyle index and (b) the Newell functions. The Wing models are a set of neural network-based Kp forecast models adopted by NOAA/Space Weather Prediction Center in March 2011 to supersede the Costello Kp model. This study indicates that any of the three Rice neural net predictors had a better success rate than the Wing model in predicting Kp (r=0.828 with Boyle, r=0.843 with Ram, and r =0.820 with Newell for 1 h predictions; similarly, r=0.739, 0.769, and 0.755 for 3 h predictions) in real time. In a head-to-head challenge using harvested real-time outputs between April 2011 and February 2013, the Rice Boyle Kp models predicted better than the Wing models (0.771 versus 0.714 for 1 h predictions and 0.770 versus 0.744 for 3 h predictions). In addition, Wing's prediction was missing more often than the Rice prediction (≈6% versus 4.6%), meaning it had less reliability. The Rice models also predict AE (r=0.811 with Boyle; 0.806 with Ram; 0.765 with Newell, and 0.743 with Boyle; 0.747 with Ram for 1 h and 3 h predictions) and pressure-corrected Dst (r=0.790; 0.767, and 0.704, and r=0.795; 0.797 and 0.707 for 1 h and 3 h predictions).
机译:自2007年10月以来,Kp的Rice神经网络模型已在http://mms.rice.edu/realtime/forecast.html上实时运行; Dst和AE模型于2010年5月添加到我们的运营中。所有这些模型均使用Boyle索引作为根据ACE实时输入计算得出的基函数。后来,2012年11月又增加了两个驱动功能:(a)将动压力项添加到Boyle指数的“ Ram”功能,以及(b)Newell功能。 Wing模型是一套基于神经网络的Kp预测模型,NOAA /太空天气预报中心于2011年3月采用了Wing模型,以取代Costello Kp模型。这项研究表明,在预测Kp时,三个Rice神经网络预测器中的任何一个在预测Kp方面均比Wing模型具有更高的成功率(对于h预测,r = 0.828,对于Ram而言r = 0.843,对于Newell而言r = 0.820;类似地,实时3小时的预测r = 0.739、0.769和0.755)。在2011年4月至2013年2月之间使用收获的实时产出进行的面对面挑战中,Rice Boyle Kp模型的预测优于Wing模型(1小时预测的预测值为0.771对0.714,3小时预测的预测结果为0.770对0.744)。此外,Wing的预测比Rice的预测遗漏的频率更高(≈6%对4.6%),这意味着它的可靠性较低。莱斯模型还预测了AE(对于波义耳而言r = 0.811;对于Ramel而言r0.86;对于Newell而言0.763;对于Boyle而言0.743;对于Ram预测1h和3h的0.747)和压力校正后的Dst(r = 0.790; 0.767和0.704和r = 0.795; 1小时和3小时的预测值分别为0.797和0.707)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号