首页> 外文期刊>Sophia >Camus and Nihilism
【24h】

Camus and Nihilism

机译:加缪和虚无主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Camus published an essay entitled ‘Nietzsche and Nihilism,’ which was later incorporated into The Rebel. Camus' aim was to assess Nietzsche's response to the problem of nihilism. My aim is to do the same with Camus. The paper explores Camus' engagement with nihilism through its two major modalities: with respect to the individual and the question of suicide in The Myth of Sisyphus, and with respect to the collective and the question of murder in The Rebel. While a Nietzschean influence thoroughly suffuses both books, it is in the second that Camus' most explicit, and most critical, engagement with the German philosopher takes place. The crux of Camus' critique of Nietzsche is that the absolute affirmation of existence he proposes as a response to nihilism cannot say ‘no’ to murder. In the terms of Camus' discussion in The Rebel, Nietzsche's philosophy is thus culpable in the straying of rebellion from its own foundations and its slide into bloody revolution. First, the paper argues that Camus' criticisms of Nietzsche are misplaced. Camus focuses his analysis on sections of the problematic text The Will to Power and misses important sections of Nietzsche's published texts which in fact support the condemnation of revolution which is the project of The Rebel. However, the paper argues that Camus moves beyond Nietzsche in radically democratizing the response to nihilism. While Nietzsche's hopes for the creation of meaning are focused on exceptional individuals, Camus insists that any response to nihilism needs to be accessible to the average person. Such a move is laudable, but it raises a number of questions and challenges regarding the type of problem nihilism is, and how these might be addressed.
机译:加缪发表了一篇题为《尼采与虚无主义》的文章,后来被纳入《叛军》。加缪的目的是评估尼采对虚无主义问题的反应。我的目的是对Camus做同样的事情。本文通过两种主要方式探讨了加缪与虚无主义的互动:关于西西弗斯神话中的个人和自杀问题,以及关于反叛者中的集体和谋杀问题。尽管尼采的影响力使这两本书都得到了充分的体现,但第二点却是加缪与德国哲学家最明确,最批判的交往。加缪对尼采的批判的症结在于,他提出的对虚无主义的存在的绝对肯定不能对谋杀说“不”。就加缪在《反叛者》中的讨论而言,尼采的哲学因此被归咎于叛乱从其自身的根基流失到其血腥革命。首先,论文认为加缪对尼采的批评是错误的。加缪将他的分析重点放在有问题的文本《权力的意志》的各个部分上,而错过了尼采出版的文本的重要部分,这些文本实际上支持了对革命的谴责,而革命是叛军的计划。但是,该论文认为,加缪超越了尼采,从根本上使对虚无主义的回应民主化。尼采对创造意义的希望主要集中在杰出的个人上,而加缪坚持认为,普通人才能对虚无主义做出任何反应。这种举动值得称赞,但它提出了关于虚无主义的类型以及如何解决这些问题的许多问题和挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号