首页> 外文期刊>Sophia >Metaxological ‘Yes’ and Existential ‘No’: William Desmond and Atheism
【24h】

Metaxological ‘Yes’ and Existential ‘No’: William Desmond and Atheism

机译:形而上学的“是”和存在的“否”:威廉·戴斯蒙德和无神论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article explores and critically assesses the metaxological account of a philosophy of God professed by William Desmond. Postmodern reflection on the philosophy of God has a tendency to focus on the 'signs' of God and urges for a passive acceptance of these signs. Desmond argues, contrary to this tendency, for a mindful togetherness of philosophical activity and religious passivity. After exploring Desmond's thought on this topic, I move to assess his 'metaxological yes' to God as the agapeic origin from an existential point of view. Initially it seems that his 'yes' is somewhat strained as it burdens itself with an excessive task of having faith into something that is beyond determination. I illustrate this insight by referring to Friedrich Nietzsche’s 'Thus Spoke Zarathustra.' Nietzsche's existential 'No' toward transcendence is a consequence of a mindful confrontation with the excesses as play.
机译:本文探索并批判地评估了威廉·戴斯蒙德(William Desmond)所宣称的上帝哲学的代谢学解释。对上帝哲学的后现代思考倾向于把重点放在上帝的“符号”上,并敦促人们被动接受这些符号。与这种趋势相反,德斯蒙德主张哲学活动与宗教被动性的思想统一。在探究了戴斯蒙德关于这个主题的思想之后,我从存在的角度评估他对神作为无神论起源的“方法论上的是”。最初,他的“是”似乎有些紧张,因为他承担了过多的信念,使自己对无法确定的事物感到负担。我通过参考弗里德里希·尼采的“因此话语Zarathustra”来说明这种见解。尼采对超越的存在的“否”是对过度行为的一种理性对抗的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号