...
首页> 外文期刊>Solar Physics >Comparison of Observations at ACE and Ulysses with Enlil Model Results: Stream Interaction Regions During Carrington Rotations 2016 – 2018
【24h】

Comparison of Observations at ACE and Ulysses with Enlil Model Results: Stream Interaction Regions During Carrington Rotations 2016 – 2018

机译:ACE和Ulysses观测结果与Enlil模型结果的比较:2016-2018年卡灵顿旋转期间的水流相互作用区域

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

During the latitudinal alignment in 2004, ACE and Ulysses encountered two stream interaction regions (SIRs) each Carrington rotation from 2016 to 2018, at 1 and 5.4 AU, respectively. More SIR-driven shocks were observed at 5.4 AU than at 1 AU. Three small SIRs at 1 AU merged to form a strong SIR at 5.4 AU. We compare the Enlil model results with spacecraft observations from four aspects: i) the accuracy of the latest versions of models (WSA v2.2 and Enlil v2.7) vs. old versions (WSA v1.6 and Enlil v2.6), ii) the sensitivity to different solar magnetograms (MWO vs. NSO), iii) the sensitivity to different coronal models (WSA vs. MAS), iv) the predictive capability at 1 AU vs. 5.4 AU. We find the models can capture field sector boundaries with some time offset. Although the new versions have improved the SIR timing prediction, the time offset can be up to two days at 1 AU and four days at 5.4 AU. The models cannot capture some small-scale structures, including shocks and small SIRs at 1 AU. For SIRs, the temperature and total pressure are often underestimated, while the density compression is overestimated. For slow wind, the density is usually overestimated, while the temperature, magnetic field, and total pressure are often underestimated. The new versions have improved the prediction of the speed and density, but they need more robust scaling factors for magnetic field. The Enlil model results are very sensitive to different solar magnetograms and coronal models. It is hard to determine which magnetogram-coronal model combination is superior to others. Higher-resolution solar and coronal observations, a mission closer to the Sun, together with simulations of greater resolution and added physics, are ways to make progress for the solar wind modeling.
机译:在2004年的纬度校准期间,ACE和Ulysses从2016年到2018年在Carrington旋转中遇到了两个流相互作用区域(SIR),分别位于1和5.4 AU。在5.4 AU观察到的SIR驱动的电击要多于1 AU。 1 AU下的三个小型SIR合并在一起,形成5.4 AU下的强SIR。我们从四个方面比较了Enlil模型结果和航天器观测结果:i)最新版本模型(WSA v2.2和Enlil v2.7)与旧版本(WSA v1.6和Enlil v2.6)的准确性, ii)对不同太阳磁图的敏感性(MWO与NSO),iii)对不同日冕模型的敏感性(WSA与MAS),iv)1 AU与5.4 AU的预测能力。我们发现这些模型可以捕获具有一定时间偏移的现场扇区边界。尽管新版本改进了SIR时序预测,但时间偏移在1 AU时最多可达两天,而在5.4 AU时最多可达四天。这些模型无法捕获一些小规模的结构,包括1 AU处的冲击和小的SIR。对于SIR,通常会低估温度和总压,而高估密度压缩值。对于慢风,密度通常会被高估,而温度,磁场和总压力通常会被低估。新版本改进了速度和密度的预测,但是它们需要更强大的磁场比例因子。 Enlil模型的结果对不同的太阳磁图和日冕模型非常敏感。很难确定哪种磁图-冠状模型组合优于其他组合。分辨率更高的太阳和日冕观测,更接近太阳的任务,以及更高分辨率的模拟和增加的物理学,是使太阳风建模取得进展的方法。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Solar Physics 》 |2011年第1期| p.179-203| 共25页
  • 作者单位

    Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA;

    Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA;

    Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA;

    Goddard Space Flight Center, NASA, Code 674, Greenbelt, MD, 20771, USA;

    Goddard Space Flight Center, NASA, Code 674, Greenbelt, MD, 20771, USA;

    Predictive Science, Inc., San Diego, CA, 92121, USA;

    Predictive Science, Inc., San Diego, CA, 92121, USA;

    Space Science and Applications, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA;

    Space Science and Applications, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Coronal model; Corotating interaction region; Heliospheric model; Radial evolution; Solar wind; Space weather;

    机译:日冕模型;同向相互作用区域;日球模型;径向演化;太阳风;空间天气;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号