Vorticity of Subsurface Flows of Emerging and Decaying Active Regions

摘要

We study the temporal variation of the vorticity of subsurface flows of 828 active regions and 977 quiet regions. The vorticity of these flows is derived from measured subsurface velocities. The horizontal flows are determined by analyzing high-resolution Global Oscillation Network Group Doppler data with ring-diagram analysis covering a range of depths from the surface to about 16 Mm. The vertical velocity component is derived from the divergence of the measured horizontal flows using mass conservation. We determine the change in unsigned magnetic flux density during the disk passage of each active region using Michelson Doppler Imager (MDI) magnetograms binned to the ring-diagram grid with centers spaced by 7.5° ranging ± 52.5° in latitude and central meridian distance with an effective diameter of 15° after apodization. We then sort the data by their flux change from decaying to emerging flux and divide the data into five subsets of equal size. We find that the vorticity of subsurface flows increases during flux emergence and decreases when active regions decay. For flux emergence, the absolute values of the zonal and meridional vorticity components show the most coherent variation with activity, while for flux decrease the strongest signature is in the absolute values of the meridional and vertical vorticity components. The temporal variation of the enstrophy (residual vorticity squared) is thus a good indicator for either flux increase or decrease. There are some indications that the increase in vorticity during flux emergence happens about a day later at depths below about 8 Mm compared to layers shallower than about 4 Mm. This timing difference might imply that the vorticity signal analyzed here is caused by the interaction between magnetic flux and turbulent flows near the solar surface. There are also hints that the vorticity decrease during flux decay begins about a day earlier at layers deeper than about 8 Mm compared to shallower ones. However, the timing difference between the change at different depths is comparable to the time step of the analysis.