首页> 外文期刊>Solar Energy >Design and comparative analysis of photovoltaic and parabolic trough based CSP plants
【24h】

Design and comparative analysis of photovoltaic and parabolic trough based CSP plants

机译:基于光伏和抛物面槽的CSP植物的设计与对比分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Solar energy can be exploited by two main methods to produce electrical energy, by means of photovoltaic (PV) panels to directly convert the sunlight into electrical energy and by using thermodynamic cycle with the help of concentrated solar power (CSP) approach to convert the heat of the sun into electricity. The objective of this research is to design and evaluate the performance of these two main methods of electrical energy generation at three different sites in Saudi Arabia. The parabolic trough CSP plant uses synthetic oil as heat transfer fluid and molten salt for the thermal energy storage system. Both CSP and PV plants have been designed for the same nameplate capacity of 100 MW. The technical comparison is performed based on solar to electrical efficiency, electrical output, capacity utilization factor, and land use factor while economic comparison includes net present value (NPV), net capital cost (NCC), levelized cost of energy (LCOE), and payback period. CSP plants have better electrical output and capacity utilization factor compared to PV plants while PV plants exhibit far better economic performance. Tabuk site is proven to be the best location for both CSP and PV plants. The best case CSP plant has 33.3% more electrical energy generation compared to the best-case PV plant. The capacity utilization factor of the CSP plant is 45.4% vs. 30.2% for PV plant. The CSP plant has 4.5 times higher NCC compared to PV plant. The LCOE of CSP plant is 2.73 times higher than that of PV plant. Overall CSP technology has better technical performance while PV technology is economically more feasible than the CSP technology at the proposed locations. This comparison between the two technologies could provide very useful guidelines for policy maker to choose the appropriate technology for a project.
机译:通过两种主要方法可以利用太阳能来生产电能,通过光伏(PV)面板直接将阳光转换为电能,并通过在集中的太阳能(CSP)方法的帮助下使用热力学循环来转换热量太阳陷入电力。本研究的目的是设计和评估这两种主要方法在沙特阿拉伯三个不同地点的主要电能发电方法的性能。抛物线槽CSP工厂使用合成油作为热能储存系统的传热流体和熔盐。 CSP和PV工厂都设计了100 MW的相同铭牌容量。技术比较是基于太阳能到电气效率,电输出,容量利用因素和土地利用因子的经济比较,包括净现值(NPV),净资本成本(NCC),能源均成本(LCoE),以及投资回收期。与光伏工厂相比,CSP工厂具有更好的电气输出和能力利用率,而PV工厂表现出更好的经济性能。禁止网站被证明是CSP和PV工厂的最佳位置。与最佳案例PV工厂相比,最佳案例CSP工厂具有33.3%的电能发电。 CSP植物的产能利用率为光伏厂的45.4%效率为45.4%。与PV工厂相比,CSP厂具有4.5倍高的NCC。 CSP厂的LCOE比光伏工厂高2.73倍。整体CSP技术具有更好的技术性能,而PV技术在经济上比拟议地点的CSP技术更加可行。这两种技术之间的这种比较可以为决策者提供非常有用的指导方针,以为项目选择合适的技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号