...
首页> 外文期刊>Soil Science Society of America Journal >Runoff, Soil Erosion, and Erodibility of Conservation Reserve Program Land under Crop and Hay Production
【24h】

Runoff, Soil Erosion, and Erodibility of Conservation Reserve Program Land under Crop and Hay Production

机译:作物和干草生产下的径流,土壤侵蚀和保护储备计划土地的可蚀性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

There are concerns that restored grasslands currently under the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) will experience increased soil erosion when they are returned to crop production. Our objective was to compare runoff, erosion, and erodibility on CRP land converted to annual hay production (permanent hayed, PH) and crop production under conventional-till (preplant disk tillage, CT) and no-till (NT) management. Erosion study was conducted in central North Dakota on Typic Argiustoll soil 6 yr after the CRP land had been converted to hay production and crop production with a spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) –winter wheat–dry pea (Pisum sativum L.) rotation. Runoff volumes and soil loss (by alum precipitation of sediment) were measured on 1.5 by 5 m bordered plots on 4% slope under a rainfall simulator delivering 1- to 3-h rains at 50 or 75 mm h–1, followed by three rains of 20 min or less at rates from 25 to 125 mm h–1. Erodibility was calculated from ratios and regressions of soil loss rates versus runoff rates measured at relative steady state. Runoff rates from 50 and 75 mm h–1 rains for CT, NT, and PH averaged 9, 12, and 21 mm h–1, respectively, and supported soil loss rates of 20, 7, and 8 g m–2 h–1. Erodibility of undisturbed CT, NT, and PH was 1.65, 0.29, and 0.28 g m–2 mm–1, respectively, showing NT did not differ from PH and that CT management increased erodibility six-fold above PH. Thorough disk tillage increased erodibility three-fold over CT, 15-fold over NT, and nine-fold over PH. Complete, nondisturbing residue removal increased erodibility less than tillage, from 1.2 times for CT to 2.5 times for NT. Chemically weeded NT exhibited the same low erodibility as the grassland PH treatment under the conditions of study—4% land slope, above average precipitation, and a residue-productive crop rotation. However, erodibility of tilled NT was significantly higher than that of tilled PH, showing the higher inherent stability of grassland surface soil with its perennial plant root structures.
机译:有人担心,目前 “自然保护区计划”(CRP)下的恢复草地在恢复作物生产后会遭受更多的 水土流失。我们的 目标是比较 转化为年干草的CRP土地(永久干草, PH)和农作物产量下的径流,侵蚀和侵蚀性。传统耕作(种植前盘 耕作,CT)和免耕(NT)管理。在CRP土地被转化为干草和 crop生产后,在北达科他州中部的Typic Argiustoll土壤6 yr上进行了侵蚀研究。春小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)–冬季 小麦–干豌豆(Pisum sativum L.)轮作。在降雨模拟器下,在4%坡度的1.5 x 5 m边界地块上,测量了径流量 和土壤流失(由沉积物的明矾沉淀) 在50或75 mm h –1 下进行1到3小时的降雨,然后在 下进行20分钟或更短的三场降雨,速率从25到125 mm h –1 。根据在相对稳定状态下测得的土壤流失率与径流率的比率和回归 ,计算出可蚀性。 CT,NT和PH的50和75 mm h –1 降雨 的径流量平均为9、12和21 mm h –1 和支持的土壤流失速率分别为20、7和8 gm –2 h –1 CT,NT和PH不变的可蚀性分别为1.65、0.29和 0.28 gm –2 mm –1 ,表明NT没有 与PH不同,并且CT管理将可蚀性提高到PH的六倍。彻底的盘耕提高了土壤的可蚀性 ,比CT高3倍,比NT高15倍,比PH高9倍。 sup>不到耕种,从CT的1.2倍到NT的2.5倍。 化学除草的NT在研究条件下表现出与 草地PH处理相同的低侵蚀性- 4% 土地坡度,高于平均降水量,且产生残留的 作物轮作。然而,耕作NT的可蚀性明显高于耕作PH,表现出具有多年生植物根部结构的草地表层土壤具有更高的固有稳定性 。上>

著录项

  • 来源
    《Soil Science Society of America Journal》 |2004年第4期|1332-1341|共10页
  • 作者单位

    State Key Lab. of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, 26 Xinong Rd., Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, Peoples Republic of China,USDA-ARS-SPNRU, 2150 Centre Ave., Bldg. D, Suite 100, Ft. Collins, CO 80526;

    U. S. Dep. of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Northern Great Plains Research Lab., P.O. Box 459, Mandan, ND 58554,USDA-ARS-SPNRU, 2150 Centre Ave., Bldg. D, Suite 100, Ft. Collins, CO 80526;

    State Key Lab. of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, 26 Xinong Rd., Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, Peoples Republic of China,USDA-ARS-SPNRU, 2150 Centre Ave., Bldg. D, Suite 100, Ft. Collins, CO 80526;

    USDA-ARS, National Soil Erosion Research Lab., 1196 SOIL Bldg., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907-1196,USDA-ARS-SPNRU, 2150 Centre Ave., Bldg. D, Suite 100, Ft. Collins, CO 80526;

    State Key Lab. of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, 26 Xinong Rd., Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, Peoples Republic of China,USDA-ARS-SPNRU, 2150 Centre Ave., Bldg. D, Suite 100, Ft. Collins, CO 80526;

    INRA Orléans–Science du Sol, Avenue de la Pomme de Pin, BP 20619, F-45166 Olivet Cedex, France,USDA-ARS-SPNRU, 2150 Centre Ave., Bldg. D, Suite 100, Ft. Collins, CO 80526;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号