首页> 外文期刊>Soil Science Society of America Journal >Automation of the Water-Drop Method for Soil Aggregate Stability Analysis
【24h】

Automation of the Water-Drop Method for Soil Aggregate Stability Analysis

机译:滴水法自动进行土壤团聚体稳定性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The water-drop method (WDM) is a long-established and excellent means of measuring soil aggregate stability. While the WDM is very reliable, it has a drawback in that it requires manual observation of aggregate breakdown and a manual count of the number of water drops required to disperse a soil aggregate. This makes the method inconvenient and prone to error. To avoid this drawback, we propose a procedure that utilizes digital observations of aggregate breakdown and electronic recording of the water-drop count. In this procedure, water drops from a Mariotte's tube pass through an electronic device that records the passage of each drop. The impact of water drops on the soil aggregate is digitally recorded with a camcorder. From the drop count and aggregate breakdown records, the number of water drops that strike an aggregate until it is dispersed can be determined. This procedure was evaluated using soil samples from the surface of four different soils. With the automated method, we determined the number of 4.3-mm-diam. water drops, each having energy of 1.67 mJ, required to destroy a 4.00- to 4.75-mm-diam. aggregate, premoistened to a matric suction of 10 kPa, until it passed through a 2.8-mm sieve. The WDM was conducted both manually and with the automated method and the results were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Twenty aggregates were used for each soil in both methods. There were no significant differences (P < 0.10) between the automated and manual methods in the mean energy required to break an aggregate.
机译:水滴法(WDM)是一种长期有效的测量土壤团聚体稳定性的 方法。尽管WDM是非常可靠的,但它的缺点是需要手动观察总分解,并且需要手动计算水的数量 这会使该方法不方便并且容易出错。为避免 的缺点,我们提出了一种程序,该程序利用数字 的总分解观察和电子记录 的水滴计数。在此过程中,来自 马里奥特管的水滴穿过电子设备,该设备记录 每滴的通过。水滴对便携式计算机上的土壤 集料的影响进行了数字记录。从drop 计数和聚合击穿记录中,可以确定撞击聚合体直到分散的水滴 的数量。 此过程是使用来自四种不同土壤表面 的土壤样品进行评估。使用自动方法,我们确定了 直径为4.3毫米的直径。每个水滴的能量为 1.67 mJ,它们需要破坏直径为4.00至4.75 mm的水。聚集体, 预先润湿至10 kPa的矩阵吸力,直到 通过2.8毫米的筛子。 WDM既可以手动 进行,也可以使用自动化方法进行,并使用方差分析(ANOVA)对结果进行 进行比较。在两种方法中,每种土壤都使用了二十种骨料 。自动方法和手动方法之间的 平均能量在打破骨料所需的平均能量上没有显着差异。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Soil Science Society of America Journal》 |2010年第1期|1-4|共4页
  • 作者

    Samuel C. Jimba; Birl Lowery;

  • 作者单位

    Dep. of Soil Science, Univ. of Wisconsin–Madison, 1525 Observatory Dr., Madison, WI 53706;

    Dep. of Soil Science, Univ. of Wisconsin–Madison, 1525 Observatory Dr., Madison, WI 53706;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号