...
首页> 外文期刊>Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering >Data field application in removing large P-phase arrival picking errors and relocating a mine microseismic event
【24h】

Data field application in removing large P-phase arrival picking errors and relocating a mine microseismic event

机译:数据字段应用程序在删除大的P相到达挑选误差并重新映射矿山微震事件

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Seismic source location is a key parameter in the microseismic (MS) monitoring technology, and its accuracy is correlated with the calculation of some other event source parameters (e.g., event magnitude and focal mechanism). The conventional location methods usually take advantages of objective functions based on all arrival-time dataset and solve them through optimization algorithms, while a local optimization may be obtained due to the influence of initial iteration point. Even if a global grid search algorithm is applied, it is likely to obtain a poor location result when there are large P-phase arrival picking errors. Therefore, this study proposed a method to remove large picking errors from P-phase arrival time dataset and relocate the seismic source based on bootstrap sampling selected sub datasets and data field theory. Its basic principles are shown as follows: by using the time difference (TD2) method through the simplex algorithm, seismic sources are located based on sub datasets of P-phase arrival time from multiple bootstrap sampling, and the location mean value of points with the 50 largest potential values in the data field is taken as the approximate location result of a MS event. Furthermore, according to the approximate location, the difference between theoretical travel time of P waves at each sensor and travel time based on the observed arrival time is calculated, and then a threshold value is set to remove large picking errors. Furthermore, by repeating the above steps of bootstrap sampling and data field based location, an accurate relocation is obtained. The synthetic tests and application were based on sensor locations of the Institute of Mine Seismology (IMS) acquisition system settled in the Yongshaba mine (China). Two typical synthetic events were separately set inside and outside the sensor array, and eight blasting events with known locations were treated as test data. These events were located and studied by utilizing the TD2 method, data field based TD2 method (DF1-TD2) and data field based TD2 method with large picking errors removed (DF2-TD2). Results demonstrate that the TD2 method shows a poor location stability when large picking errors are present, while location errors obtained by the DF1-TD2 and DF2-TD2 methods are obviously smaller than that of the TD2 method. Moreover, location results obtained by the DF2-TD2 method with large picking errors removed are superior to those without removing large picking errors. Furthermore, the DF2-TD2 method was applied to locate 300 MS events, the location elevations are well consistent with the stope distribution, showing that the method has a good application prospect. Finally, the data field theory was combined with other location objective functions and P-phase arrival time picked by the Akaike information criterion (AIC) method, and we obtained good location results. In addition, the data field based location results obtained through a grid search algorithm and the simplex algorithm are similar. Therefore, the combinations of data field with different objective functions, automatic P-phase arrival picking methods and iteration algorithms show broad prospects.
机译:地震源位置是微震(MS)监测技术中的关键参数,其精度与计算其他事件源参数(例如,事件幅度和焦点机制)相关。传统的位置方法通常基于所有到达时间数据集采用客观功能的优点,并通过优化算法来解决它们,而由于初始迭代点的影响,可以获得局部优化。即使应用了全局网格搜索算法,当存在大的P阶段到达挑选错误时,它可能会获得差的位置结果。因此,本研究提出了一种从P相到达时间数据集去除大型拾取误差的方法,并基于自举采样选择的子数据集和数据字段理论重新定位地震源。其基本原理如下所示:通过使用Simplex算法使用时差(TD2)方法,地震源基于来自多个自举采样的P阶段到达时间的子数据集,以及点的位置平均值数据字段中的50个最大潜在值被视为MS事件的近似位置结果。此外,根据近似位置,计算每个传感器的P波的理论行驶时间与基于观察到的到达时间的行进时间的差异,然后将阈值设置为去除大的拾取误差。此外,通过重复引导抽样采样和基于数据场的位置的上述步骤,获得了准确的重定位。合成试验和应用基于矿山地震学研究所(IMS)收购系统的传感器位置,在永莎矿山(中国)定居。两个典型的合成事件在传感器阵列内部和外部分别设置,并将具有已知位置的八次爆破事件被视为测试数据。通过利用TD2方法,基于TD2的TD2方法(DF1-TD2)和基于数据字段的TD2方法来定位和研究这些事件,并除去了大的拾取误差(DF2-TD2)。结果表明,当存在大拾取误差时,TD2方法显示出差的位置稳定性,而DF1-TD2和DF2-TD2方法获得的位置误差明显小于TD2方法的位置误差。此外,通过除去具有大的拾取误差的DF2-TD2方法获得的位置结果优于未去除大型拾取误差的方法。此外,施加DF2-TD2方法以定位300ms事件,位置升高与缩小分布良好,表明该方法具有良好的应用前景。最后,数据字段理论与Akaike信息标准(AIC)方法挑选的其他位置目标函数和P阶段到达时间相结合,我们获得了良好的位置结果。另外,通过网格搜索算法和单简算法获得的基于数据场的位置结果是相似的。因此,数据字段的组合具有不同的目标函数,自动p阶段到达拣选方法和迭代算法显示了广阔的前景。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering》 |2020年第12期|496-511|共16页
  • 作者单位

    Chongqing Univ Sch Resources & Safety Engn State Key Lab Coal Mine Disaster Dynam & Control Chongqing 400044 Peoples R China|Cent South Univ Sch Resources & Safety Engn Changsha 410083 Peoples R China;

    Chongqing Univ Sch Resources & Safety Engn State Key Lab Coal Mine Disaster Dynam & Control Chongqing 400044 Peoples R China;

    Chongqing Univ Sch Resources & Safety Engn State Key Lab Coal Mine Disaster Dynam & Control Chongqing 400044 Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Microseism; Source location; Data field; Large picking error;

    机译:微痉挛;源位置;数据字段;大拣选错误;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号