...
首页> 外文期刊>Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering >Comparison of shear wave velocities evaluated in the core zone of an existing fill dam by field and laboratory tests
【24h】

Comparison of shear wave velocities evaluated in the core zone of an existing fill dam by field and laboratory tests

机译:通过现场和实验室测试比较现有填充坝核心区的剪切波速度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The objective of this study is to compare shear wave velocities evaluated by laboratory and field tests in the core zone of an existing fill dam, and to verify the applicability of empirical methods by comparing the shear wave velocities evaluated by empirical methods with those evaluated by experimental methods. In this study, boring and sampling were conducted at the Yeongcheon dam in Korea. Laboratory tests on the core samples were carried out and field tests such as borehole surveys and seismic methods were conducted to evaluate the shear wave velocity. The results obtained by laboratory and field tests were compared. Furthermore, the results obtained by these experimental methods were compared with those obtained by empirical methods. The shear wave velocity determined by the seismic methods was, to a limited extent, lower than that determined by the borehole surveys at shallow depths of less than 15 m, but was predicted to be similar at depths deeper than 15 m. The results of the two kinds of laboratory tests were almost similar to each other but both the results were 10-20% lower than those obtained by the seismic methods. The results obtained by the empirical method based on the field tests and the measured in-situ records were similar to the field test results. On the other hand, the results obtained by the empirical method using the basic properties of sample cores were similar to the laboratory test results.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较实验室和现场测试在一个现有坝坝核心区的剪切波速度,并通过将经验方法评估的剪切波速度与实验方法评估的剪切波速度进行比较,验证经验方法的适用性。方法。在这项研究中,在韩国的永川水坝进行了钻孔和采样。对岩心样品进行了实验室测试,并进行了诸如钻孔勘测和地震方法之类的现场测试,以评估剪切波速度。比较了通过实验室和现场测试获得的结果。此外,将通过这些实验方法获得的结果与通过经验方法获得的结果进行比较。通过地震方法确定的剪切波速度在一定程度上低于在小于15 m的浅层深度进行的钻孔测量所确定的剪切波速度,但据预测在大于15 m的深度处具有相似的剪切波速度。两种实验室测试的结果几乎彼此相似,但两者均比通过地震方法获得的结果低10-20%。通过基于现场测试的经验方法和实测记录获得的结果与现场测试结果相似。另一方面,使用样品芯的基本特性通过经验方法获得的结果与实验室测试结果相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号