首页> 外文期刊>Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering >2-D soil-structure interaction in time domain by the SBFEM and two non-linear soil models
【24h】

2-D soil-structure interaction in time domain by the SBFEM and two non-linear soil models

机译:利用SBFEM和两个非线性土壤模型进行时域二维土-结构相互作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Effects of soil-structure interaction (SSI) have proven to be of more importance than to be ignored. Quite a few methods of modeling and analysis exist to anticipate the real behavior of the structure when placed on flexible soil rather than on rigid ground surface. Yet, how to model the soil needs to be inspected carefully since probable deformations of soil may be at times far from predicted. In this study a newly formed approach is inspected to suggest possible solutions to shortcomings of conventional ones, compare two non-linear soil models, and implement strengths of newer methods. The soil-structure system is modeled and analyzed once directly with the UCSD soil model and then compared with nonlinear sub-structuring method with the UCD model. Analyzes are performed in the time domain for both cases. The soil is supposed to be comprised of sands with various density values. The Loma-Prieta earthquake record (Loma-Prieta, 1989) is used to carry out time domain analyzes and capture structural responses. The interactional forces exerted to the near-field soil, which account for the interaction between these two media as well as the radiation damping of the infinite half-space, have replaced the earthquake motion and the far-field has accordingly been truncated out. The non-linear near-field soil structure system has then been dynamically analyzed. Force outputs reveal a decrease when elastoplastic SSI is considered; while displacement amplitudes are found to be greater for cases not involving SSI, or involving elastic SSI. Changing the applied constitutive model for the soil as well as sand density from loose to dense manifests changes in responses. As the soil gets denser, the SSI behavior gets closer to that of the elastic case. Contrary to the sub-structuring method which usually, and conventionally, assumes linear elastic behavior for the soil-structure system, direct modeling may predict non-linear responses of the system and effects of the structure's being placed upon an inelastic environment. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:事实证明,土壤-结构相互作用(SSI)的影响比被忽略更为重要。存在许多建模和分析方法,可以预测结构放置在柔性土壤而不是刚性地面上时的真实行为。但是,如何对土壤进行建模需要仔细检查,因为土壤可能发生的变形有时可能远非预期。在这项研究中,对一种新形成的方法进行了研究,以提出解决传统方法的缺点的可能方法,比较两个非线性土壤模型,并实现新方法的优势。用UCSD土壤模型直接对土壤-结构系统进行建模和分析,然后与UCD模型与非线性子结构方法进行比较。两种情况都在时域中进行分析。假定土壤由各种密度值的沙子组成。 Loma-Prieta地震记录(Loma-Prieta,1989)用于进行时域分析并捕获结构响应。施加到近场土壤上的相互作用力(取代了这两种介质之间的相互作用以及无限半空间的辐射衰减)已取代了地震运动,因此远场被截断了。然后对非线性近场土壤结构系统进行了动态分析。考虑弹塑性SSI时,力输出显示出减小;而对于不涉及SSI或涉及弹性SSI的情况,位移幅度会更大。将适用的土壤本构模型以及沙子密度从松散更改为密实,可以反映出响应的变化。随着土壤变得更稠密,SSI行为变得更接近于弹性情况。与通常在常规情况下假设土结构系统具有线性弹性行为的子构造方法相反,直接建模可以预测系统的非线性响应以及结构对非弹性环境的影响。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号