首页> 外文期刊>Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering >On correlations between 'dynamic' (small-strain) and 'static' (large-strain) stiffness moduli - An experimental investigation on 19 sands and gravels
【24h】

On correlations between 'dynamic' (small-strain) and 'static' (large-strain) stiffness moduli - An experimental investigation on 19 sands and gravels

机译:关于“动态”(小应变)和“静态”(大应变)刚度模量之间的相关性-对19种砂石砾石的实验研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Correlations between "dynamic" (small-strain) and "static" (large-strain) stiffness moduli for sand are examined. Such correlations are often used for a simplified estimation of the dynamic stiffness based on static test data. The small-strain shear modulus G(dyn) = G(max) and the small-strain constrained modulus M-dyn = M-max have been measured in resonant column (RC) tests with additional P-wave measurements. Oedometric compression tests were performed in order to determine the large-strain constrained modulus M-stat = M-oedo, while the large-strain Young's modulus E-stat = E-50 was obtained from the initial stage of the stress-strain-curves measured in drained monotonic triaxial tests, evaluated as a secant stiffness between deviatoric stress q=0 and q = q(max)/2. Experimental data for 19 sands or gravels with specially mixed grain size distribution curves, having different non-plastic fines contents, mean grain sizes and uniformity coefficients, were analyzed. Based on the present data, it is demonstrated that a correlation between M-max and M-oedo proposed in the literature underestimates the dynamic stiffness of coarse and well-graded granular materials. Consequently, modified correlation diagrams for the relationship M-max M-oedo are proposed in the present paper. Furthermore, correlations between G(max) and M-oedo or E-50, respectively, have been also investigated. They enable a direct estimation of dynamic shear modulus based on static test data. In contrast to the correlation diagram currently in use, the range of applicability of the new correlations proposed in this paper is clearly defined.
机译:检查了沙子的“动态”(小应变)和“静态”(大应变)刚度模量之间的关系。这种相关性通常用于基于静态测试数据的动态刚度的简化估计。小应变剪切模量G(dyn)= G(max)和小应变约束模量M-dyn = M-max已在共振柱(RC)测试中进行了额外的P波测量。为了确定大应变约束模量M-stat = M-oedo,进行了测压测试,而大应变杨氏模量E-stat = E-50是从应力-应变曲线的初始阶段获得的在排水单调三轴试验中测得的值,以偏应力q = 0和q = q(max)/ 2之间的割线刚度评估。分析了19种具有特殊混合的粒度分布曲线的砂或砾石的实验数据,这些曲线具有不同的非塑性细粉含量,平均粒度和均匀度系数。根据目前的数据,证明了文献中提出的M-max和M-oedo之间的相关性低估了粗糙且渐变良好的颗粒材料的动态刚度。因此,本文提出了修正的关系图M-max M-oedo。此外,还分别研究了G(max)与M-oedo或E-50之间的相关性。它们能够基于静态测试数据直接估算动态剪切模量。与当前使用的相关图相反,本文中提出的新相关的适用范围已明确定义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号