首页> 外文期刊>Software process improvement and practice >Experiences with Conducting Project Postmortems: Reports versus Stories
【24h】

Experiences with Conducting Project Postmortems: Reports versus Stories

机译:进行项目验尸的经验:报告与故事

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The most popular unit of work in organizations is a project. Managing knowledge in and about projects is salient for successful project management. In this article, we will discuss how postmortems can be used to capture tacit experiences in projects. Conducting a postmortem, either after a milestone or at the end of a project, is salient in order to gauge what has been learnt, what were the main issues faced, and what can be used to improve the processes of work in the future. The conducting of postmortems aids in articulation of tacit experiences into explicit forms. This enables for experiences to be better re-used in the future. Re-using of postmortem findings depends heavily on the nature of the postmortem outcome. We will compare two kinds of postmortem outcomes - traditional reports and stories. Both types have their pros and cons, and management must choose the right kind of postmortem report to calibrate, depending on the project and learning outcomes. The article will also highlight lessons learnt from conducting postmortem reviews in several software organizations.
机译:组织中最受欢迎的工作单元是一个项目。管理项目中和项目中的知识对于成功进行项目管理非常重要。在本文中,我们将讨论如何使用事后分析来捕获项目中的默认经验。在里程碑之后或项目结束时进行验尸是很重要的,目的是评估已学到的知识,面临的主要问题以及可以用来改进未来工作流程的知识。进行尸体解剖有助于将默契经验表达为显式形式。这使得将来可以更好地重用经验。重用验尸结果很大程度上取决于验尸结果的性质。我们将比较两种验尸结果-传统报告和故事。两种类型都有其优缺点,并且管理层必须根据项目和学习成果来选择正确的验尸报告类型进行校准。本文还将重点介绍在多个软件组织中进行事后审查所获得的经验教训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号