...
【24h】

Peeved at Payola

机译:在佩奥拉处死

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

I despise product placement in movies. As soon as I see a strategically overt logo hogging camera time, I'm thrown right out of that delicious suspended disbelief and into a stew of anger over greedy producers. By the same token, I hate it when I get a call from a former or current advertiser seeking editorial coverage. (Thankfully, it happens infrequently.) I always tell the caller that breaching the editorial/advertising barrier is problematic, precisely because it puts me in a "damned if I do, damned if I don't" situation. If I do, by pure coincidence, run coverage of vendors who complain that they've been unjustly ignored, they feel vindicated and believe that complaining to the editor while threatening the publisher is the golden road to more coverage. If I don't, the advertiser's self-fulfilling prophecy comes true: "I won't spend money in a publication that doesn't mention my products, and this publication doesn't do that even when I complain directly to the editor in chief."
机译:我鄙视电影中的产品位置。当我看到战略上明显的徽标占用相机时间时,我立刻就被那美味的暂时性怀疑所淹没,对贪婪的制片人感到愤怒。同样,当我收到来自寻求编辑报道的前广告商或当前广告商的电话时,我讨厌它。 (非常感谢,这种情况很少发生。)我总是告诉来电者,违反社论/广告壁垒是有问题的,这恰恰是因为这使我处于“如果我不行,那么该死”的情况。如果我确实是偶然地报道了抱怨他们被不公正地忽视了的供应商,那么他们会被证明是正确的,并相信向编辑抱怨同时威胁出版商是扩大覆盖范围的黄金之路。如果我不这样做,那么广告客户的自我实现的预言就可以实现:“我不会在没有提及我的产品的出版物上花钱,即使我直接向编辑投诉,也不会这样做。首席。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号