首页> 外文期刊>Socio-Economic Review >Two sides of the same coin? Left-wing governments and labour unions as determinants of public spending
【24h】

Two sides of the same coin? Left-wing governments and labour unions as determinants of public spending

机译:同一枚硬币的两侧?左翼政府和工会是公共支出的决定因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The social policy literature normally perceives left-wing governments and labour unions as pursuing the same policies, namely generous social protection. This paper investigates whether or not this is accurate. Due to their different criteria of organizational success, it argues that unions and left-wing governments prioritize social programmes differently. Unions give priority to labour market-related programmes like unemployment protection; left-wing governments prioritize family services and old-age pensions. The paper thereby adds considerable nuance to the literature on labour movements and the welfare state.
机译:社会政策文献通常将左翼政府和工会视为奉行相同的政策,即慷慨的社会保护。本文调查这是否正确。由于组织成功的标准不同,它认为工会和左翼政府对社会计划的优先次序有所不同。工会优先考虑与劳动力市场相关的计划,例如失业保护;左翼政府优先考虑家庭服务和养老金。因此,本文为有关劳工运动和福利状态的文献增添了不少细微差别。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Socio-Economic Review》 |2012年第2期|p.217-240|共24页
  • 作者

    Carsten Jensen*;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号