首页> 外文期刊>Socio-economic planning sciences >Measuring productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency changes of CPA firms prior to, and following the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
【24h】

Measuring productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency changes of CPA firms prior to, and following the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

机译:在《萨班斯-奥克斯利法案》之前和之后衡量注册会计师事务所的生产率增长,技术进步和效率变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper investigates productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change for a group of the 56 largest CPA firms in the US from the period 1996-1999 through the period 2003-2006, where the former preceded, and the latter followed, enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX). Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is used to calculate Malm-quist indices of three measures of interest: productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change. Results indicate that CPA firms, on average, experienced a productivity growth of approx. 17% from the pre- to post-SOX period. Consistent with the finding of Banker et al. [Banker RD, Chang H, Natarajan R. Productivity change, technical progress and relative efficiency change in the public accounting industry. Management Science 2005;51:291-304], this productivity gain can be attributed primarily to technical progress rather than a change in relative efficiency. In addition, results indicate that the "Big 4" firms underperformed their non-Big 4 counterparts in both productivity growth and technical progress.
机译:本文研究了1996年至1999年至2003年至2006年期间美国56家最大的CPA公司中的一组的生产率增长,技术进步和效率变化,在此之前,后者在颁布之前。萨班斯-奥克斯利法案(SOX)。数据包络分析(DEA)用于计算感兴趣的三个指标的Malm-quist指数:生产率增长,技术进步和效率变化。结果表明,CPA公司平均而言的生产率增长约为5%。从SOX之前到之后的时间占17%。与Banker等人的发现一致。 [银行RD,Chang H,NataarajanR。公共会计行业的生产率变化,技术进步和相对效率变化。 Management Science 2005; 51:291-304],这种生产率的提高主要归因于技术进步,而不是相对效率的变化。此外,结果表明,“四大”公司在生产率增长和技术进步方面均落后于非四大公司。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号