首页> 外文期刊>Social Semiotics >Losing touch: pedagogies of incorporation and the ability to write
【24h】

Losing touch: pedagogies of incorporation and the ability to write

机译:失去联系:公司注册法和写作能力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The idea of “touch” is often used to point to the exemplary performance of skilful actions. While such a notion seemingly references the sensuous nature of that skill, it tends to mask the embodied acquisition of that capacity, implying intuitive ability rather than technique perfected through practice. Ironically, it also masks the significance of tactility in the process of developing this “touch”. In the context of a child learning to write, this is especially important. This article explores the importance of touch in learning to construct written text. It argues that its physicality is profoundly “ecological”: writing entails a variety of relations of touch with diverse material objects. These relations have to be ordered into what we call the line of touch, which produces the sensual continuity of subject and these objects necessary for the “grace” of textual production. Drawing on the work of Merleau-Ponty and recent theorisation of embodiment, this article considers the ways in which tactility allows the body to “remember” text embodying not simply the shape and directionality of letters when handwriting, but the knowledge of the letters themselves. This process represents a form of “muscular memory”, “knowledge in the hands”, in which children necessarily “lose” the awareness of touch to achieve the automaticity required for the task of composition. The relations and lines of touch also have a pedagogic quality. A child does not simply or naturally acquire the capacity to write; they are taught to do so, and the pedagogies that effect this process are instrumental to their embodied competence. Touch and the incorporation of the sensibility of this technology through iteration are crucial aspects of literacy practice, yet, as this article will examine, are undervalued within the theory and practice of literacy pedagogy.View full textDownload full textKeywordstouch, pedagogy, embodiment, writingRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2011.591995
机译:“触摸”的概念通常被用来指技巧动作的典范表现。尽管这种想法看似是指该技能的感性本质,但它往往掩盖了该能力的具体体现,这意味着直观的能力,而不是通过实践完善的技术。具有讽刺意味的是,它也掩盖了在开发这种“触摸”过程中触觉的重要性。在孩子学习写作的情况下,这一点尤为重要。本文探讨了触摸在学习构建书面文本中的重要性。它认为它的物理性具有深远的“生态性”:写作需要与各种各样的物质对象建立各种联系。这些关系必须按照我们所说的“接触线”进行排序,从而产生主体和这些物体在感性上的连续性,这对于文本生产的“优雅”是必要的。借助Merleau-Ponty的工作和对体现的最新理论,本文考虑了触觉允许身体“记住”文本的方式,这些文本不仅体现了手写时字母的形状和方向性,而且还体现了对文本的认识。自己写信。这个过程代表了一种“肌肉记忆”的形式,即“手中的知识”,在这种过程中,儿童必定会“失去”对触摸的认识,以实现构图任务所需的自动性。关系和联系线也具有教学质量。一个孩子不能简单或自然地获得写作的能力。他们被教导要这样做,而影响这一过程的教学法对于他们所体现的能力至关重要。触摸和通过迭代结合该技术的敏感性是扫盲实践的关键方面,但是,正如本文将要探讨的那样,在扫盲教育学的理论和实践中,该方法的价值被低估。查看全文下载全文关键字触摸,教育学,体现力,写作相关变量addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2011.591995

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号